• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同根管冲洗剂联合克霉唑对感染根管内粪肠球菌的抗菌效果比较

Comparative Study of Antifungal Efficacy of Various Endodontic Irrigants with and without Clotrimazole in Extracted Teeth Inoculated with .

机构信息

Department of Dental Surgery, Karpagam Faculty of Medical Sciences and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, Phone: +91 9486646966, e-mail:

Department of Endodontics, Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Dec 1;21(12):1325-1330.

PMID:33893253
Abstract

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To assess the application of clotrimazole (1%) as a complementary antifungal agent along with sodium hypochlorite (5.25%), chlorhexidine gluconate (2%), and doxycycline hydrochloride (5%) against .

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy freshly extracted single-rooted premolars with matured apices were collected, stored, and handled according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and recommendations. These were divided into three groups (two tests and one control group) depending on irrigants used. The efficacy of each irrigant group was compared. The observations were statistically analyzed by the multiple intergroup comparisons using ANOVA and Scheffe multiple comparisons ( < 0.001).

RESULTS

The sodium hypochlorite (group IA-mean 129.6) has shown a statistically significant decrease in colony-forming units (CFUs) ( < 0.01) on comparison with chlorhexidine [(IB) mean 190.2]. A similar result was obtained in comparison with the sodium hypochlorite group (IA) and doxycycline HCl group [(IC) mean 318.4] and also between the sodium hypochlorite group (IA) and the control group [(III) mean 554.2]. The intragroup comparison of group II, group IIA (mean 63.3), and group IIB (mean 73.8) showed no statistically significant difference. Group III (mean 554.2) was the least effective of all the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Sodium hypochlorite showed better antifungal efficacy than chlorhexidine and doxycycline when used alone. The addition of clotrimazole increased the efficiency of doxycycline also, but it was less compared to sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine. Within the limitations of this study, the inclusion of 1% clotrimazole increased the antifungal efficacy of all the three irrigants.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Our study compared the efficacy of the various endodontic irrigants and also determined their efficiency with the addition of the antifungal agent. Clotrimazole (1%) addition in irrigating solutions showed better results and promoted faster healing.

摘要

目的和目标

评估克霉唑(1%)作为一种辅助抗真菌剂与次氯酸钠(5.25%)、葡萄糖酸氯己定(2%)和盐酸多西环素(5%)联合应用对抗 。

材料和方法

从 70 颗新鲜拔出的成熟根尖单根前磨牙中收集、储存和处理,符合职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)和疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的指南和建议。根据使用的冲洗液将这些分为三组(两组测试组和一组对照组)。比较每组冲洗液的疗效。通过方差分析和 Scheffe 多重比较对观察结果进行统计学分析( < 0.001)。

结果

与葡萄糖酸氯己定(IB 组,平均 190.2)相比,次氯酸钠(IA 组,平均 129.6)在降低菌落形成单位(CFUs)方面具有统计学意义( < 0.01)。与次氯酸钠组(IA)和盐酸多西环素组(IC 组,平均 318.4)以及次氯酸钠组(IA)和对照组(III 组,平均 554.2)相比,也得到了类似的结果。组 II、组 IIA(平均 63.3)和组 IIB(平均 73.8)的组内比较无统计学意义。组 III(平均 554.2)是所有亚组中效果最差的。

结论

单独使用时,次氯酸钠的抗真菌效果优于葡萄糖酸氯己定和盐酸多西环素。加入克霉唑也提高了盐酸多西环素的效率,但与次氯酸钠和葡萄糖酸氯己定相比效果较差。在本研究的限制范围内,加入 1%克霉唑提高了所有三种冲洗液的抗真菌效果。

临床意义

本研究比较了各种根管冲洗液的疗效,并确定了加入抗真菌剂后的效果。在冲洗液中加入克霉唑(1%)可获得更好的效果并促进更快的愈合。

相似文献

1
Comparative Study of Antifungal Efficacy of Various Endodontic Irrigants with and without Clotrimazole in Extracted Teeth Inoculated with .不同根管冲洗剂联合克霉唑对感染根管内粪肠球菌的抗菌效果比较
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Dec 1;21(12):1325-1330.
2
Antifungal efficacy of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, and 17% EDTA with and without an antifungal agent.含或不含抗真菌剂的 5.25%次氯酸钠、2%葡萄糖酸氯己定和 17%依地酸的抗真菌效果。
J Endod. 2010 Apr;36(4):675-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.01.015.
3
In vitro antifungal efficacy of four irrigants as a final rinse.四种冲洗剂作为终末冲洗的体外抗真菌效果。
J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):331-3. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.08.017.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Antifungal Activity of Octenidine: An Confocal Laser Study.奥替尼啶抗真菌活性的比较评估:一项共聚焦激光研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Aug 1;21(8):905-909.
5
A comparative antimicrobial analysis of various root canal irrigating solutions on endodontic pathogens: an in vitro study.不同根管冲洗液对牙髓病病原体的抗菌效果比较分析:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Mar 1;15(2):153-60. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1506.
6
A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants.2.0%葡萄糖酸氯己定与5.25%次氯酸钠作为牙髓病抗菌冲洗剂的比较。
J Endod. 1994 Jun;20(6):276-8. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80815-0.
7
Comparative antifungal efficacy of light-activated disinfection and octenidine hydrochloride with contemporary endodontic irrigants.光动力活化消毒与盐酸奥替尼啶对比当代根管冲洗液的抗真菌效果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2015 Feb;30(2):669-75. doi: 10.1007/s10103-013-1387-1. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
8
In vitro antibacterial efficacy of endodontic irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis.根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的体外抗菌效果
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):702-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.007. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
9
In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis, BioPure MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans.蜂胶、BioPure MTAD、次氯酸钠和氯己定对粪肠球菌和白色念珠菌的体外抗菌活性。
Saudi Med J. 2011 May;32(5):479-83.
10
Antibacterial Effect of Azadirachta indica (Neem) or Curcuma longa (Turmeric) against Enterococcus faecalis Compared with That of 5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine in vitro.印度楝(印楝)或姜黄对粪肠球菌的抗菌作用与5%次氯酸钠或2%氯己定的体外抗菌作用比较
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2017;58(2):103-109. doi: 10.2209/tdcpublication.2015-0029.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine as Irrigants in Root Canal Therapy.次氯酸钠与氯己定作为根管治疗冲洗剂的抗菌效果比较分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S454-S456. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1422_24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
2
Anti-Candidal Action of Epigallocatechin Gallate as Intracanal Medicament-A Microbiological and Dentin Model Study.表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯作为根管内药物的抗念珠菌作用——一项微生物学和牙本质模型研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4855-S4857. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1093_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
3
Exploring Efficacy and Safety: Comparative Evaluation of Different Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Therapy at a Tertiary Care Setting.
探索疗效与安全性:三级医疗环境下根管治疗中不同冲洗液的比较评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2546-S2548. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_277_24. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Comparative Analysis of Various Irrigation Solutions in Root Canal Treatment.根管治疗中各种冲洗液的对比分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2740-S2742. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_276_24. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
5
Efficacy of Various Herbal Preparations Against Oral Candida: A Lab-Based Study.多种草药制剂对口腔念珠菌的疗效:一项基于实验室的研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S265-S267. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_486_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
6
Comparison of Different Antibiotic Medications on Microorganisms: An Original Research.不同抗生素药物对微生物的比较:一项原创研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S223-S226. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_471_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
7
Periapical Healing Outcome of Endodontic Re-Treatment Using Calcium Silicates Versus Resin-Based Sealers: A Systematic Review.使用硅酸钙与树脂类封闭剂进行根管再治疗的根尖周愈合结果:一项系统评价
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S90-S92. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_556_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Update on -Black Mold Perceived as Toxigenic and Potentially Pathogenic to Humans.关于被视为对人类具有产毒和潜在致病性的黑霉菌的最新情况。
Biology (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;11(3):352. doi: 10.3390/biology11030352.