Kruis Ryan, Brown Elizabeth A, Johnson Jada, Simpson Kit N, McElligott James, Harvey Jillian
Center for Telehealth, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Department of Health Sciences and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Telemed Rep. 2024 Apr 3;5(1):89-98. doi: 10.1089/tmr.2023.0065. eCollection 2024.
Telehealth utilization surged during the COVID-19 pandemic, offering expanded health care access. Audio-only visits emerged as a crucial tool for patients facing technology or connectivity barriers to still use telehealth. This qualitative study aims to better understand patient perceptions of audio-only versus video telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how patients perceive the role of each in their overall health care.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 adult patients seeking care at an academic medical center located in the Southeast region of the United States. Patients had experienced both an audio-only and video telehealth visit within the past 6 months. Topics covered in the interview included comfort, preference, quality, and communication during each type of visit. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed using a general inductive approach.
Participants valued having both modalities available largely due to convenience and saw these visits as supplemental or supporting their in-person care. Preferences for visit types were varied among participants and were context-specific, influenced by visit purpose and provider rapport. Patients viewed audio-only visits favorably for informational follow-ups and highlighted their convenience, particularly for multitasking and caregiving duties. In contrast, video visits were seen as more effective for communication due to visual cues and better suited for demonstrating health conditions. Audio-only visits were also seen as less technology-dependent and served as a vital back-up to failed video encounters.
Despite varied preferences, patients perceived both modalities as complementary to in-person care. Concerns around the quality of care were mitigated by patients' and providers' judicious use of visit types based on clinical appropriateness and existing rapport. The results emphasize the necessity and flexibility of audio-only visits in ensuring equitable access to telehealth, especially for those with technology limitations or demanding responsibilities. To maintain the access and convenience afforded by telehealth and ensure these benefits are offered equitably, policy makers and health care organizations must continue to provide flexible telehealth options, including audio-only visits.
在新冠疫情期间,远程医疗的使用激增,提供了更广泛的医疗服务途径。对于面临技术或连接障碍的患者来说,仅音频问诊成为他们仍能使用远程医疗的关键工具。这项定性研究旨在更好地了解患者在新冠疫情期间对仅音频问诊与视频远程医疗问诊的看法,以及患者如何看待每种问诊方式在其整体医疗保健中的作用。
对在美国东南部地区一家学术医疗中心寻求治疗的14名成年患者进行了半结构化访谈。患者在过去6个月内经历过仅音频问诊和视频远程医疗问诊。访谈涵盖的主题包括每种问诊方式中的舒适度、偏好、质量和沟通情况。访谈逐字记录、编码,并采用一般归纳法进行分析。
参与者重视两种问诊方式都可用,主要是因为方便,并将这些问诊视为对其面对面护理的补充或支持。参与者对问诊类型的偏好各不相同,且因具体情况而异,受问诊目的和与医疗服务提供者的融洽关系影响。患者对仅音频问诊在信息随访方面评价良好,并强调其便利性,特别是在多任务处理和护理职责方面。相比之下,视频问诊由于视觉线索被认为在沟通方面更有效,更适合展示健康状况。仅音频问诊也被视为对技术依赖程度较低,并且是视频问诊失败时的重要备用方式。
尽管偏好各异,但患者认为两种问诊方式都是面对面护理的补充。患者和医疗服务提供者根据临床适用性和现有的融洽关系明智地使用问诊类型,减轻了对医疗质量的担忧。结果强调了仅音频问诊在确保公平获得远程医疗方面的必要性和灵活性,特别是对于那些有技术限制或责任繁重的人。为了维持远程医疗提供的可及性和便利性,并确保公平地提供这些益处,政策制定者和医疗保健组织必须继续提供灵活的远程医疗选择,包括仅音频问诊。