Yang Li-Yu, Li Jian-Ri, Chen Chuan-Shu, Cheng Chen-Li, Hung Sheng-Chun, Chiu Kun-Yuan, Yang Cheng-Kuang, Hsu Chiann-Yi, Wang Shian-Shiang
Department of Urology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Division of Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Intensive Care, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 26;15:1281654. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1281654. eCollection 2024.
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is an important treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. A lot of clinical evidence proved the survival benefits of ICI, but cost-effectiveness of the treatment remains unclear. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the ICIs treatment in different sequences among mUC patients. We retrospectively analyzed mUC patients who had been treated at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. These patients received chemotherapy with or without ICI treatment (Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Nivolumab, Durvalumab, or Avelumab). The patients were divided into three different groups: receiving chemotherapy alone, receiving a combination of first-line ICI and chemotherapy (ICI combination therapy), and receiving chemotherapy as the first-line treatment followed by second-line ICI therapy (Subsequent ICI therapy). The primary endpoint was cost per life day, while lifetime medical costs and overall survival were also evaluated. The 74 enrolled patients had a median age of 67.0 years, with 62.2% being male. Of these patients, 23 had received chemotherapy only, while the remaining patients had received combined therapy with ICI in either first-line or as subsequent agents (37 patients had ever received atezolizumab, 18 pembrolizumab, 1 Durvalumab, 1 Nivolumab, and 1 Avelumab separately.). Fifty-five patients (74.3%, 55/74) received cisplatin amongst all the patients who underwent chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 5.2-49.9) in the first-line ICI combination therapy group, and 8.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-10.8) in the chemotherapy only. Median overall survival for the subsequent ICI therapy group was not reached. The median lifetime cost after metastatic UC diagnosis was USD 31,221. The subsequent ICI therapy group had significantly higher costs when compared with the ICI combination therapy group (155.8 USD per day, [IQR 99.0 to 220.5] v 97.8 USD per day, [IQR 60.8 to 159.19], = 0.026). Higher insurance reimbursement expenses for the subsequent ICI therapy group were observed when compared with the ICI combination therapy group. Our real-world data suggests that first line use of ICI combined with chemotherapy demonstrates better cost-effectiveness and similar survival outcomes for mUC patients, when compared with subsequent ICI therapy after chemotherapy.
免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)是转移性尿路上皮癌(mUC)患者的重要治疗选择。大量临床证据证明了ICI对患者生存有益,但该治疗的成本效益仍不明确。本研究评估了ICI治疗在mUC患者中不同治疗顺序的成本效益。我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2020年12月期间在我院接受治疗的mUC患者。这些患者接受了单独化疗或联合ICI治疗(帕博利珠单抗、阿替利珠单抗、纳武利尤单抗、度伐利尤单抗或阿维鲁单抗)。患者被分为三个不同组:单纯接受化疗组、一线接受ICI联合化疗组(ICI联合治疗组)、一线接受化疗后二线接受ICI治疗组(后续ICI治疗组)。主要终点是每生命日成本,同时还评估了终生医疗成本和总生存期。74例入组患者的中位年龄为67.0岁,男性占62.2%。其中,23例仅接受了化疗,其余患者在一线或作为后续药物接受了ICI联合治疗(37例曾分别接受阿替利珠单抗、18例接受帕博利珠单抗、1例接受度伐利尤单抗、1例接受纳武利尤单抗和1例接受阿维鲁单抗)。所有接受化疗的患者中,55例(74.3%,55/74)接受了顺铂治疗。一线ICI联合治疗组的中位总生存期为27.5个月(95%CI,5.2 -至49.9),单纯化疗组为8.9个月(95%CI,7.1 -至10.8)。后续ICI治疗组的中位总生存期未达到。转移性UC诊断后的中位终生成本为31,221美元。与ICI联合治疗组相比,后续ICI治疗组的成本显著更高(每天155.8美元,[四分位间距99.0至220.5]对每天97.8美元,[四分位间距60.8至159.19],P = 0.026)。与ICI联合治疗组相比,后续ICI治疗组的保险报销费用更高。我们的真实世界数据表明,与化疗后使用后续ICI治疗相比,一线使用ICI联合化疗对mUC患者具有更好的成本效益和相似的生存结果。