Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Med Phys. 2024 May;51(5):3207-3219. doi: 10.1002/mp.17058. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
Current methods for Gamma Knife (GK) treatment planning utilizes either manual forward planning, where planners manually place shots in a tumor to achieve a desired dose distribution, or inverse planning, whereby the dose delivered to a tumor is optimized for multiple objectives based on established metrics. For other treatment modalities like IMRT and VMAT, there has been a recent push to develop knowledge-based planning (KBP) pipelines to address the limitations presented by forward and inverse planning. However, no complete KBP pipeline has been created for GK.
To develop a novel (KBP) pipeline, using inverse optimization (IO) with 3D dose predictions for GK.
Data were obtained for 349 patients from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre. A 3D dose prediction model was trained using 322 patients, based on a previously published deep learning methodology, and dose predictions were generated for the remaining 27 out-of-sample patients. A generalized IO model was developed to learn objective function weights from dose predictions. These weights were then used in an inverse planning model to generate deliverable treatment plans. A dose mimicking (DM) model was also implemented for comparison. The quality of the resulting plans was compared to their clinical counterparts using standard GK quality metrics. The performance of the models was also characterized with respect to the dose predictions.
Across all quality metrics, plans generated using the IO pipeline performed at least as well as or better than the respective clinical plans. The average conformity and gradient indices of IO plans was 0.737 0.158 and 3.356 1.030 respectively, compared to 0.713 0.124 and 3.452 1.123 for the clinical plans. IO plans also performed better than DM plans for five of the six quality metrics. Plans generated using IO also have average treatment times comparable to that of clinical plans. With regards to the dose predictions, predictions with higher conformity tend to result in higher quality KBP plans.
Plans resulting from an IO KBP pipeline are, on average, of equal or superior quality compared to those obtained through manual planning. The results demonstrate the potential for the use of KBP to generate GK treatment with minimal human intervention.
目前的伽玛刀(GK)治疗计划采用手动正向计划,规划者手动在肿瘤中放置射野以实现期望的剂量分布,或采用逆向计划,根据既定指标优化肿瘤的剂量分布以实现多个目标。对于调强放疗(IMRT)和容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)等其他治疗方式,最近已经开发了基于知识的计划(KBP)管道来解决正向和逆向计划的局限性。然而,还没有为 GK 开发完整的 KBP 管道。
开发一种使用基于 3D 剂量预测的逆向优化(IO)的新型 GK 的 KBP 管道。
从 Sunnybrook 健康科学中心获得了 349 名患者的数据。基于之前发表的深度学习方法,使用 322 名患者训练了一个 3D 剂量预测模型,并为其余 27 名样本外患者生成了剂量预测。开发了一个广义 IO 模型,从剂量预测中学习目标函数权重。然后,将这些权重用于逆向计划模型中以生成可交付的治疗计划。还实现了剂量模拟(DM)模型进行比较。使用标准的 GK 质量指标比较生成计划的质量与临床对应计划的质量。还根据剂量预测来评估模型的性能。
在所有质量指标方面,使用 IO 管道生成的计划至少与相应的临床计划一样好,或者更好。IO 计划的平均适形度和梯度指数分别为 0.737 0.158 和 3.356 1.030,而临床计划分别为 0.713 0.124 和 3.452 1.123。对于六个质量指标中的五个,IO 计划也优于 DM 计划。使用 IO 生成的计划的平均治疗时间与临床计划相当。关于剂量预测,具有更高适形度的预测往往会产生更高质量的 KBP 计划。
使用 IO KBP 管道生成的计划在质量上平均与通过手动计划获得的计划相当或更好。结果表明,使用 KBP 生成 GK 治疗具有最小的人为干预潜力。