Wang Juanqi, Hu Weigang, Yang Zhaozhi, Chen Xiaohui, Wu Zhiqiang, Yu Xiaoli, Guo Xiaomao, Lu Saiquan, Li Kaixuan, Yu Gongyi
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Radiat Oncol. 2017 May 22;12(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13014-017-0822-z.
Knowledge-based planning (KBP) is a promising technique that can improve plan quality and increase planning efficiency. However, no attempts have been made to extend the domain of KBP for planners with different planning experiences so far. The purpose of this study was to quantify the potential gains for planners with different planning experiences after implementing KBP in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for left-sided breast cancer patients.
The model libraries were populated with 80 expert clinical plans from treated patients who previously received left-sided breast-conserving surgery and IMRT with simultaneously integrated boost. The libraries were created on the RapidPlan. 6 planners with different planning experiences (2 beginner planners, 2 junior planners and 2 senior planners) generated manual and KBP optimized plans for additional 10 patients, similar to those included in the model libraries. The plan qualities were compared between manual and KBP plans.
All plans were capable of achieving the prescription requirement. There were almost no statistically significant differences in terms of the planning target volume (PTV) coverage and dose conformality. It was demonstrated that the doses for most of organs-at-risk (OARs) were on average lower or equal in KBP plans compared to manual plans except for the senior planners, where the very small differences were not statistically significant. KBP data showed a systematic trend to have superior dose sparing at most parameters for the heart and ipsilateral lung. The observed decrease in the doses to these OARs could be achieved, particularly for the beginner and junior planners. Many differences were statistically significant.
It is feasible to generate acceptable IMRT plans after implementing KBP for left-sided breast cancer. KBP helps to effectively improve the quality of IMRT plans against the benchmark of manual plans for less experienced planners without any manual intervention. KBP showed promise for homogenizing the plan quality by transferring planning expertise from more experienced to less experienced planners.
基于知识的计划制定(KBP)是一种很有前景的技术,它可以提高计划质量并提高计划效率。然而,迄今为止尚未尝试将KBP的应用范围扩展到具有不同计划经验的计划制定者。本研究的目的是量化在为左侧乳腺癌患者制定调强放射治疗(IMRT)计划时实施KBP后,不同计划经验的计划制定者可能获得的收益。
模型库中纳入了80例接受过左侧保乳手术并同步整合加量IMRT治疗的患者的专家临床计划。这些库是在RapidPlan上创建的。6名具有不同计划经验的计划制定者(2名初级计划制定者、2名中级计划制定者和2名高级计划制定者)为另外10名患者生成了手动计划和KBP优化计划,这些患者与模型库中纳入的患者相似。比较了手动计划和KBP计划之间的计划质量。
所有计划均能达到处方要求。在计划靶区(PTV)覆盖和剂量适形性方面几乎没有统计学上的显著差异。结果表明,除高级计划制定者外,KBP计划中大多数危及器官(OAR)的剂量平均低于或等于手动计划,高级计划制定者中非常小的差异无统计学意义。KBP数据显示,在心脏和同侧肺的大多数参数上,有系统地倾向于具有更好的剂量 sparing。观察到这些OAR剂量的降低是可以实现的,特别是对于初级和中级计划制定者。许多差异具有统计学意义。
对左侧乳腺癌实施KBP后生成可接受的IMRT计划是可行的。KBP有助于在无需任何手动干预的情况下,以手动计划为基准有效地提高经验较少的计划制定者的IMRT计划质量。KBP显示出通过将计划专业知识从经验丰富的计划制定者转移到经验较少的计划制定者来使计划质量同质化的前景。