• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国低 acuity 急诊病例的医疗服务使用情况:一项多中心观察性试点研究方案。

The Use of Medical Services for Low-Acuity Emergency Cases in Germany: Protocol for a Multicenter Observational Pilot Study.

作者信息

Nau Lara Maria, Laux Gunter, Altiner Attila, Szecsenyi Joachim, Leutgeb Rüdiger

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 10;13:e54002. doi: 10.2196/54002.

DOI:10.2196/54002
PMID:38598281
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11043931/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing number of requests for help for acutely ill patients and their management is a major problem in the health systems of many countries, but especially in Germany. Rescue coordination centers and ambulances in Germany are increasingly overloaded. As a result, rides as a part of rescue operations have been increasing in length for years, yet a relevant proportion of these operations represent low-acuity calls (LACs). The basic objective of this pilot study is the quantitative analysis of the potential misuse of requests to the rescue control center. Indications for alternative treatment options and how to handle these treatment options in nonacute, non-life-threatening health conditions, such as minor injuries or minor infectious diseases, will be assessed. The identification of these LACs is vital in order to prevent health care resources in emergency medical care becoming inadequate.

OBJECTIVE

The overarching goal of this study is to determine the percentage of unnecessary rescue missions on site and subsequently to obtain an impression of the paramedics' assessment of alternative treatment options or alternative methods of rescue transportation.

METHODS

This will be an exploratory, noninterventional, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach. The study is multicentric, with 21 ambulances in 12 different locations. The data for this study were collected via a questionnaire, newly developed for this study, for rescue personnel. Additionally, secondary data from the responsible control center will be linked and processed in an initial descriptive analysis. This descriptive analysis will form the basis for a subsequent variance analysis.

RESULTS

Data collection started as projected on September 18, 2023, and was ongoing until end of November 2023. We expect the documentation of several thousand rescue operations. We expect the following study results: (1) many unnecessary rescue operations, (2) immediate on-site assessment of correct care and treatment, and (3) patients' reasons for calling a rescue coordination center.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first observational study in which acute rescue operations are recorded on site. The focus of this study is on the trained paramedics' assessment of whether rescue operations are necessary or not. Additionally, alternative treatments, such as out-of-hours care service or primary care service, are shown for each individual case. The study also intends to cover the question of which factors are relevant and statistically significantly connected to the misuse of ambulances.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Register for Clinical Studies (Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien) DRKS00032510; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032510.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/54002.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0098/11043931/933186c38f3e/resprot_v13i1e54002_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0098/11043931/933186c38f3e/resprot_v13i1e54002_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0098/11043931/933186c38f3e/resprot_v13i1e54002_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

对急重症患者求助及救治需求的不断增加是许多国家卫生系统面临的重大问题,在德国尤为突出。德国的救援协调中心和救护车负担日益加重。因此,救援行动中的转运时间多年来一直在延长,然而这些行动中有相当一部分是低 acuity 呼叫(LAC)。本试点研究的基本目标是对救援控制中心接到的求助可能被滥用的情况进行定量分析。将评估在非急性、非危及生命的健康状况下,如轻伤或轻度传染病,替代治疗方案的指征以及如何处理这些治疗方案。识别这些 LAC 对于防止紧急医疗护理中的医疗资源不足至关重要。

目的

本研究的总体目标是确定现场不必要救援任务的百分比,并随后了解护理人员对替代治疗方案或替代救援运输方法的评估情况。

方法

这将是一项采用定量方法的探索性、非干预性横断面研究。该研究为多中心研究,涉及 12 个不同地点的 21 辆救护车。本研究的数据通过为救援人员新开发的问卷收集。此外,来自负责控制中心的二手数据将被关联并在初步描述性分析中进行处理。该描述性分析将为后续的方差分析奠定基础。

结果

数据收集于 2023 年 9 月 18 日按计划开始,一直持续到 2023 年 11 月底。我们预计记录数千次救援行动。我们预计得到以下研究结果:(1)许多不必要的救援行动;(2)对正确护理和治疗的现场即时评估;(3)患者呼叫救援协调中心的原因。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一项在现场记录急性救援行动的观察性研究。本研究的重点是训练有素的护理人员对救援行动是否必要的评估。此外,针对每个具体案例展示了替代治疗方法,如非工作时间护理服务或初级护理服务。该研究还打算探讨哪些因素与救护车的滥用相关且在统计学上有显著关联。

试验注册

德国临床研究注册中心(Deutsches Register für Klinische Studien)DRKS00032510;https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00032510。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/54002。

相似文献

1
The Use of Medical Services for Low-Acuity Emergency Cases in Germany: Protocol for a Multicenter Observational Pilot Study.德国低 acuity 急诊病例的医疗服务使用情况:一项多中心观察性试点研究方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Apr 10;13:e54002. doi: 10.2196/54002.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Overcoming Language Barriers in Paramedic Care With an App Designed to Improve Communication With Foreign-Language Patients: Nonrandomized Controlled Pilot Study.使用旨在改善与外语患者沟通的应用程序克服护理人员护理中的语言障碍:非随机对照试验性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 23;7:e43255. doi: 10.2196/43255.
4
[Digital systems to support emergency medical service : A Germany-wide cross-sectional survey on current availability, utilization and existing challenges].支持紧急医疗服务的数字系统:一项关于德国范围内当前可用性、使用情况及现存挑战的横断面调查
Anaesthesiologie. 2022 Jul;71(7):518-525. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-01085-5. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER) 2: a cluster randomised trial and systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of new protocols for emergency ambulance paramedics to assess older people following a fall with referral to community-based care when appropriate.跌倒紧急转诊的支持与评估(SAFER)2:一项整群随机试验以及对新协议临床有效性和成本效益的系统评价,该协议用于紧急救护医护人员评估跌倒后的老年人,并在适当时转诊至社区护理。
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Mar;21(13):1-218. doi: 10.3310/hta21130.
6
The German approach to emergency/disaster management.德国的应急/灾害管理方法。
Med Arh. 2000;54(4):201-3.
7
Overcoming language barriers in paramedic care: a study protocol of the interventional trial 'DICTUM rescue' evaluating an app designed to improve communication between paramedics and foreign-language patients.克服急救护理中的语言障碍:干预试验“DICTUM rescue”的研究方案,评估一款旨在改善急救人员与外语患者之间沟通的应用程序。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05098-5.
8
Evaluation of a Rural Emergency Medical Service Project in Germany: Protocol for a Multimethod and Multiperspective Longitudinal Analysis.德国农村紧急医疗服务项目评估:多方法多视角纵向分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Feb 14;9(2):e14358. doi: 10.2196/14358.
9
Telemedical support for prehospital Emergency Medical Service (TEMS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.院前急救医疗服务的远程医疗支持(TEMS试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 26;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1781-2.
10
[Time in care of trauma patients in the air rescue service: implications for disposition?].[创伤患者在空中救援服务中的护理时间:对处置的影响?]
Anaesthesist. 2008 Jun;57(6):562-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-008-1373-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Compliance and patient satisfaction with treatment settings recommended by the medical on-call service 116117 in Germany using computer-assisted structured initial assessment: a cross-sectional observational study accompanying the demand intervention.德国医疗值班服务 116117 推荐的治疗环境的依从性和患者满意度:使用计算机辅助结构化初始评估的伴随需求干预的横断面观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 9;13(5):e070475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070475.
2
Use of urgent, emergency and acute care by mental health service users: A record-level cohort study.精神卫生服务使用者对紧急、急救和急性护理的使用:基于记录级别的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0281667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281667. eCollection 2023.
3
Calling an ambulance for non-emergency medical situations: Results of a cross-sectional online survey from an Australian nationally representative sample.
拨打非紧急医疗情况的救护车:来自澳大利亚全国代表性样本的横断面在线调查结果。
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Feb;35(1):133-141. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14086. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
4
Inappropriate and potentially avoidable emergency department visits of Swiss nursing home residents and their resource use: a retrospective chart-review.瑞士养老院居民不当且潜在可避免的急诊就诊及其资源利用:回顾性图表审查。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Aug 11;22(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03308-9.
5
[Emergency care: need for reform from an outpatient perspective].[急诊护理:从门诊角度看改革的必要性]
Inn Med (Heidelb). 2022 Sep;63(9):905-913. doi: 10.1007/s00108-022-01382-0. Epub 2022 Jul 27.
6
Burnout in emergency medicine professionals after 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic: a threat to the healthcare system?新冠疫情两年后急诊医学专业人员的职业倦怠:对医疗系统的一种威胁?
Eur J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug 1;29(4):279-284. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000952. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
7
[Quality of documentation and treatment in the non-physician staffed ambulance: a retrospective analysis of emergency protocols from the city of Aachen].[非医师配备救护车的文件记录与治疗质量:亚琛市急救协议的回顾性分析]
Anaesthesiologie. 2022 Sep;71(9):674-682. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01106-x. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
8
Tendency to call an ambulance or attend an emergency department for minor or non-urgent problems: a vignette-based population survey in Britain.因轻微或非紧急问题呼叫救护车或前往急诊部的倾向:基于病例的英国人群调查。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Jun;39(6):436-442. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210271. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
9
Factors in Avoidable Emergency Visits for Ambulatory Care-sensitive Conditions among Older Patients Receiving Home Care in Japan: A Retrospective Study.日本居家护理老年患者可避免急诊就诊的因素:一项回顾性研究。
Intern Med. 2022;61(2):177-183. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.7136-21. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
10
Health system influences on potentially avoidable hospital admissions by secondary mental health service use: A national ecological study.卫生系统对通过二级心理健康服务利用导致的潜在可避免住院的影响:一项全国性生态研究。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2022 Jan;27(1):22-30. doi: 10.1177/13558196211036739. Epub 2021 Aug 1.