Ma Xiaotian, Shyer Madison, Harris Kristofer, Wang Dulin, Hsu Yu-Chun, Farrell Christine, Goodwin Nathan, Anjum Sahar, Bukhbinder Avram S, Dean Sarah, Khan Tanveer, Hunter David, Schulz Paul E, Jiang Xiaoqian, Kim Yejin
Department of Health Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, McWilliams School of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Apr 10;3(4):e0000479. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000479. eCollection 2024 Apr.
The rate of progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) differs dramatically between patients. Identifying the most is critical because when their numbers differ between treated and control groups, it distorts the outcome, making it impossible to tell whether the treatment was beneficial. Much recent effort, then, has gone into identifying RPs. We pooled de-identified placebo-arm data of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), EXPEDITION, EXPEDITION 2, and EXPEDITION 3, provided by Eli Lilly and Company. After processing, the data included 1603 mild-to-moderate AD patients with 80 weeks of longitudinal observations on neurocognitive health, brain volumes, and amyloid-beta (Aβ) levels. RPs were defined by changes in four neurocognitive/functional health measures. We built deep learning models using recurrent neural networks with attention mechanisms to predict RPs by week 80 based on varying observation periods from baseline (e.g., 12, 28 weeks). Feature importance scores for RP prediction were computed and temporal feature trajectories were compared between RPs and non-RPs. Our evaluation and analysis focused on models trained with 28 weeks of observation. The models achieved robust internal validation area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROCs) ranging from 0.80 (95% CI 0.79-0.82) to 0.82 (0.81-0.83), and the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRCs) from 0.34 (0.32-0.36) to 0.46 (0.44-0.49). External validation AUROCs ranged from 0.75 (0.70-0.81) to 0.83 (0.82-0.84) and AUPRCs from 0.27 (0.25-0.29) to 0.45 (0.43-0.48). Aβ plasma levels, regional brain volumetry, and neurocognitive health emerged as important factors for the model prediction. In addition, the trajectories were stratified between predicted RPs and non-RPs based on factors such as ventricular volumes and neurocognitive domains. Our findings will greatly aid clinical trialists in designing tests for new medications, representing a key step toward identifying effective new AD therapies.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的病情进展速度差异极大。识别进展最快者至关重要,因为当治疗组和对照组中的此类患者数量不同时,会使结果产生偏差,从而无法判断治疗是否有益。因此,近期人们付出了诸多努力来识别快速进展者(RPs)。我们汇总了礼来公司提供的三项随机对照试验(RCT)——EXPEDITION、EXPEDITION 2和EXPEDITION 3中未识别身份的安慰剂组数据。经过处理后,数据涵盖了1603名轻度至中度AD患者,他们在神经认知健康、脑容量和β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)水平方面有80周的纵向观察数据。快速进展者由四项神经认知/功能健康指标的变化来定义。我们使用带有注意力机制的循环神经网络构建深度学习模型,根据从基线起不同的观察期(如12周、28周)来预测第80周时的快速进展者。计算了快速进展者预测的特征重要性得分,并比较了快速进展者与非快速进展者之间的时间特征轨迹。我们的评估和分析聚焦于用28周观察数据训练的模型。这些模型在内部验证中实现了稳健的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROCs),范围从0.80(95%置信区间0.79 - 0.82)到0.82(0.81 - 0.83),精确召回率曲线下面积(AUPRCs)从0.34(0.32 - 0.36)到0.46(0.44 - 0.49)。外部验证的AUROCs范围从0.75(0.70 - 0.81)到0.83(0.82 - 0.84),AUPRCs从0.27(0.25 - 0.29)到0.45(0.43 - 0.48)。血浆Aβ水平、局部脑容量测定和神经认知健康成为模型预测的重要因素。此外,根据脑室容积和神经认知领域等因素,预测的快速进展者和非快速进展者之间的轨迹存在分层。我们的研究结果将极大地帮助临床试验人员设计新药测试,这是朝着识别有效的新型AD疗法迈出关键的一步。