Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Metabolic Syndrome Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03856-5.
While coronary artery calcification (CAC) is recognized as a reliable marker for coronary atherosclerosis, the relationship between the concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) and the incidence and progression of CAC remains controversial.
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were systematically searched to identify relevant observational studies until October 2023. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). A random-effects meta-analysis was employed to calculate pooled odd ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals, considering heterogeneity among the studies.
Out of the 2545 records, 42 cross-sectional and 9 cohort studies were included in the systematic review. The meta-analysis on 12 eligible cross-sectional studies revealed no significant association between CAC and CRP [pooled OR: 1.03 (1.00, 1.06)]. Additionally, an insignificant association was found between CAC and CRP through meta-analysis on three eligible cohort studies [pooled OR: 1.05 (0.95, 1.15)] with no considerable heterogeneity across studies. Sensitivity analyses indicated that the meta-analysis models were robust. There was no evidence of publication bias.
Based on the meta-analysis findings, elevated levels of CRP did not emerge as a valuable prognostic maker for CAC incidence and progression prediction.
虽然冠状动脉钙化(CAC)被认为是冠状动脉粥样硬化的可靠标志物,但 C 反应蛋白(CRP)的浓度与 CAC 的发生和进展之间的关系仍存在争议。
系统检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science 和 Scopus,以确定截至 2023 年 10 月的相关观察性研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)评估纳入研究的方法学质量。考虑到研究之间的异质性,采用随机效应荟萃分析计算汇总优势比(OR)和相应的 95%置信区间。
在 2545 条记录中,系统评价纳入了 42 项横断面研究和 9 项队列研究。对 12 项合格的横断面研究进行的荟萃分析显示,CAC 与 CRP 之间没有显著关联[汇总 OR:1.03(1.00,1.06)]。此外,通过对三项合格的队列研究进行荟萃分析,发现 CAC 与 CRP 之间也没有显著关联[汇总 OR:1.05(0.95,1.15)],研究之间没有明显的异质性。敏感性分析表明,荟萃分析模型是稳健的。没有发现发表偏倚的证据。
根据荟萃分析结果,CRP 水平升高不能作为 CAC 发生和进展预测的有价值的预后标志物。