Suppr超能文献

一项关于阴茎癌患者视频内镜下根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与开放性根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术对比的可行性随机对照试验的研究方案(VELRAD)。

A study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial investigating videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy in patients with penile cancer (VELRAD).

作者信息

Tang Stanley, Akers Clare, Alnajjar Hussain, Ayres Ben, Baldini Cinzia, Embleton-Thirsk Andrew, Gurusamy Kurinchi, Hadway Paul, Kumar Vivekanandan, Lau Maurice, Nigam Raj, Pang Karl, Parnham Arie, Pizzo Elena, Ranieri Veronica, Rees Rowland, Sangar Vijay, Wadke Anvi, Williams Norman, Muneer Asif

机构信息

University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.

St George's University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024 Apr 10;10(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40814-024-01474-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penile cancer is a rare male genital malignancy. Surgical excision of the primary tumour is followed by radical inguinal lymphadenectomy if there is metastatic disease detected by biopsy, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) or following sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with impalpable disease. However, radical inguinal lymphadenectomy is associated with a high morbidity rate, and there is increasing usage of a videoendoscopic approach as an alternative.

METHODS

A pragmatic, UK-wide multicentre feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), comparing videoendoscopic radical inguinal lymphadenectomy versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Patients will be identified and recruited from supraregional multi-disciplinary team meetings (sMDT) and must be aged 18 or over requiring inguinal lymphadenectomy, with no contraindications to surgical intervention for their cancer. Participants will be followed up for 6 months following randomisation. The primary outcome is the ability to recruit patients for randomisation across all selected sites and the rate of loss to follow-up. Other outcomes include acceptability of the trial and intervention to patients and healthcare professionals assessed by qualitative research and obtaining resource utilisation information for health economic analysis.

DISCUSSION

There are currently no other published RCTs comparing videoendoscopic versus open radical inguinal lymphadenectomy. Ongoing study is required to determine whether randomising patients to either procedure is feasible and acceptable to patients. The results of this study may determine the design of a subsequent trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov PRS registry, registration number NCT05592639. Date of registration: 13th October 2022, retrospectively registered.

摘要

背景

阴茎癌是一种罕见的男性生殖系统恶性肿瘤。如果通过活检、细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)或在不可触及病变患者中进行前哨淋巴结活检检测到转移性疾病,则在切除原发性肿瘤后进行根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。然而,根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术的发病率较高,因此越来越多地使用视频内镜方法作为替代方案。

方法

一项务实的全英国多中心可行性随机对照试验(RCT),比较视频内镜根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术与开放根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。将从区域多学科团队会议(sMDT)中识别并招募患者,患者必须年满18岁或以上,需要进行腹股沟淋巴结清扫术,且对其癌症的手术干预无禁忌症。随机分组后,将对参与者进行6个月的随访。主要结局是在所有选定地点招募患者进行随机分组的能力以及失访率。其他结局包括通过定性研究评估患者和医护人员对试验和干预的可接受性,以及获取用于卫生经济分析的资源利用信息。

讨论

目前尚无其他已发表的RCT比较视频内镜与开放根治性腹股沟淋巴结清扫术。需要进行正在进行的研究,以确定将患者随机分配到任何一种手术是否可行以及患者是否接受。本研究的结果可能会决定后续试验的设计。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov PRS注册中心,注册号NCT05592639。注册日期:2022年10月13日,追溯注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5663/11005199/361bf3d94101/40814_2024_1474_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验