Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤患者神经性疼痛治疗中重复经颅磁刺激最佳靶点区域的选择:一项对比分析

Choosing the optimal target area for repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating neuropathic pain in spinal cord injury patients: a comparative analysis.

作者信息

Jin Lihua, Wang Haonan, Dong Yifei, Chen Qian, Li Linrong, Li Yongmei

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

Department of Rehabilitation, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Mar 27;15:1370420. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1370420. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The specific target area of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating neuropathic pain resulting from spinal cord injury (SCI-NP) remains uncertain.

METHODS

Thirty-four participants with SCI-NP were allocated into three groups, namely, the motor cortex (M1, A) group, the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC, B) group, and the control (sham stimulation, C) group. The intervention was administered totally 10 times. Outcome measures assessed pre-(T0) and post-(T1)intervention, including Numerical Rating scale (NRS), anxiety (SAS), depression (SDS), sleep quality (PSQI), brief pain inventory (BPI), and impression of change.

RESULTS

All outcomes in groups A and B significantly changed after intervention ( < 0.05), and the delta value (T1-T0) also significantly changed than group C ( < 0.05). The delta value of SDS in the group B was better than the group A, and the change of pain degree in the group B was moderately correlated with the change in PSQI ( = 0.575,  < 0.05). Both patients in the groups A and B showed significant impression of change about their received therapy ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both targets are effective, but LDLPFC is more effective in reducing depression in SCI-NP. Healthcare providers might select the suitable area according to the specific attributes of their patients.

摘要

目的

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗脊髓损伤所致神经病理性疼痛(SCI-NP)的具体靶点区域仍不明确。

方法

34例SCI-NP患者被分为三组,即运动皮层(M1,A)组、左侧背外侧前额叶皮层(LDLPFC,B)组和对照组(假刺激,C)组。干预共进行10次。在干预前(T0)和干预后(T1)评估结果指标,包括数字评定量表(NRS)、焦虑(SAS)、抑郁(SDS)、睡眠质量(PSQI)、简明疼痛量表(BPI)和变化印象。

结果

A组和B组的所有结果在干预后均有显著变化(<0.05),且差值(T1-T0)也比C组有显著变化(<0.05)。B组SDS的差值优于A组,B组疼痛程度的变化与PSQI的变化呈中度相关(=0.575,<0.05)。A组和B组的患者对所接受治疗均有显著的变化印象(<0.05)。

结论

两个靶点均有效,但LDLPFC在减轻SCI-NP患者的抑郁方面更有效。医疗服务提供者可根据患者的具体特征选择合适的区域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab5/11004227/f96e4a88ec3c/fneur-15-1370420-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验