Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogota, Colombia.
Int J Cancer. 2024 Sep 1;155(5):816-827. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34953. Epub 2024 Apr 11.
Overexpression of HPV-oncoproteins E6 and E7 is necessary for HPV-driven cervical carcinogenesis. Hence, these oncoproteins are promising disease-specific biomarkers. We assessed the technical and operational characteristics of the 8-HPV-type OncoE6/E7 Cervical Test in different laboratories using cervical samples from HPV-positive women living with (WLWH) and without HIV. The 8-HPV-type OncoE6/E7 Test (for short: "OncoE6/E7 test") was performed in 2833 HIV-negative women and 241 WLWH attending multicentric studies in Latin America (ESTAMPA study), and in Africa (CESTA study). Oncoprotein positivity were evaluated at each testing site, according to HIV status as well as type-specific agreement with HPV-DNA results. A feedback questionnaire was given to the operators performing the oncoprotein test to evaluate their impression and acceptability regarding the test. The OncoE6/E7 test revealed a high positivity rate heterogeneity across all testing sites (I: 95.8%, p < .01) with significant lower positivity in WLWH compared to HIV-negative women (12% vs 25%, p < .01). A similar HPV-type distribution was found between HPV DNA genotyping and oncoprotein testing except for HPV31 and 33 (moderate agreement, k = 0.57). Twenty-one laboratory technicians were trained on oncoprotein testing. Despite operators' concerns about the time-consuming procedure and perceived need for moderate laboratory experience, they reported the OncoE6/E7 test as easy to perform and user-friendly for deployment in resource-limited settings. The high positivity rate variability found across studies and subjectivity in test outcome interpretation could potentially results in oncoprotein false positive/negative, and thus the need for further refinements before implementation of the oncoprotein testing in screen-triage-and-treat approaches is warranted.
HPV 癌蛋白 E6 和 E7 的过表达是 HPV 驱动的宫颈癌发生所必需的。因此,这些癌蛋白是有前途的疾病特异性生物标志物。我们评估了不同实验室使用 HPV 阳性的 HIV 阴性和 HIV 阳性女性的宫颈样本,对 8 型 HPV 型 OncoE6/E7 宫颈检测的技术和操作特性。8 型 HPV 型 OncoE6/E7 检测(简称“OncoE6/E7 检测”)在拉丁美洲(ESTAMPA 研究)和非洲(CESTA 研究)的多中心研究中,对 2833 名 HIV 阴性女性和 241 名 HIV 阳性女性进行了检测。根据 HIV 状态以及与 HPV-DNA 结果的型特异性一致性,在每个检测地点评估癌蛋白阳性。对进行癌蛋白检测的操作人员进行了反馈问卷调查,以评估他们对该检测的印象和接受程度。在所有检测地点,OncoE6/E7 检测的阳性率存在高度异质性(I:95.8%,p<.01),与 HIV 阴性女性相比,HIV 阳性女性的阳性率显著较低(12%比 25%,p<.01)。除 HPV31 和 33 外(中度一致性,k=0.57),HPV DNA 基因分型和癌蛋白检测之间发现了相似的 HPV 型分布。对 21 名实验室技术人员进行了癌蛋白检测培训。尽管操作人员对耗时的程序和对中度实验室经验的需求表示担忧,但他们报告称,OncoE6/E7 检测易于操作,非常适合在资源有限的环境中使用。在不同研究中发现的高阳性率变异性和检测结果解释的主观性可能导致癌蛋白假阳性/假阴性,因此在实施癌蛋白检测进行筛查-分诊-治疗方法之前,需要进一步改进。