Center for Legal Systems Research, Research Triangle Institute International, Research Triangle Park.
Law Hum Behav. 2024 Apr;48(2):148-161. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000556.
Some scholars have criticized pretrial assessments for perpetuating racial bias in the criminal legal system by offering biased predictions of future legal system outcomes. Although these critiques have some empirical support, the scholarship has yet to examine the predictive validity and differential prediction of pretrial assessments across individuals by their age. Following the guidance of the life-course literature, the present study serves as the first age-graded evaluation of the Public Safety Assessment (PSA) focused on assessing whether the predictive validity and scoring predictions of the tool vary across the lifespan.
We expected that the predictive validity of the PSA scores would vary across the lifespan, such that the PSA underpredicts for younger individuals and overpredicts for older individuals.
The present study relied on pretrial information collected from 31,527 individuals during the Advancing Pretrial Policy and Research project. Logistic regression models were estimated to evaluate the differential prediction of the PSA for individuals ranging from 18 to 68 years of age. The results of bivariate models were used to produce area under the curve estimates at each year of age.
The results of the present study provided some evidence that the PSA differentially predicted pretrial outcomes for individuals from 18 to 68 years of age. Specifically, the predictive validity of the New Criminal Arrest and the New Violent Criminal Arrest scales appears to improve as individuals become older, suggesting that these instruments are better able to predict pretrial outcomes for older individuals relative to younger individuals.
The results suggest that the PSA is a valid predictor of pretrial outcomes and that the predictive validity of some PSA scores is impacted by age. These findings suggest that the age of the defendant should be accounted for when interpreting the new criminal arrest and new violent criminal arrest scores. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
一些学者批评审前评估通过对未来法律体系结果的有偏差的预测,使刑事法律体系中的种族偏见永久化。尽管这些批评有一定的实证支持,但学术界尚未研究审前评估在个人年龄方面对未来法律体系结果的预测有效性和差异预测。本研究遵循生命历程文献的指导,首次对公共安全评估(PSA)进行年龄分级评估,旨在评估该工具的预测有效性和评分预测是否因年龄而异。
我们预计 PSA 分数的预测有效性会因年龄而异,即 PSA 对年轻个体的预测不足,对年长个体的预测过度。
本研究依赖于在推进审前政策和研究项目中从 31527 名个体收集的审前信息。使用逻辑回归模型来评估 PSA 对年龄在 18 至 68 岁之间的个体的差异预测。二元模型的结果用于在每个年龄产生曲线下面积估计值。
本研究的结果提供了一些证据,表明 PSA 对年龄在 18 至 68 岁之间的个体的审前结果有差异预测。具体而言,新刑事逮捕和新暴力犯罪逮捕量表的预测有效性似乎随着个体年龄的增长而提高,这表明这些工具更能预测年长个体的审前结果,而不是年轻个体。
结果表明 PSA 是审前结果的有效预测指标,一些 PSA 分数的预测有效性受年龄影响。这些发现表明,在解释新的刑事逮捕和新的暴力犯罪逮捕分数时,应考虑被告的年龄。