Suppr超能文献

按PRESS(丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼、电/脑电图、设置与设定)启动:在一家大型教学医院引入全静脉麻醉检查表

PRESS (Propofol, Remifentanil, Electricity/EEG, Setup and Setting) to Start: Introducing a Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Checklist at a Large Teaching Hospital.

作者信息

Woodward William, Carrannante James, Dua Kanika

机构信息

Anaesthetics, St George's Hospital, London, GBR.

Anaesthesia, St George's Hospital, London, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 12;16(3):e56026. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56026. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) is becoming more widely used, and as of yet there are few safety checks for the use of TIVA when compared to inhaled anaesthesia. This study aims to assess the feasibility and utility of introducing a TIVA checklist at a large teaching hospital. Methods A survey was sent out to all consultant and trainee anaesthetists at our hospital regarding their use of TIVA and errors in practice related to its use. A checklist was created based on common errors reported in the survey, errors described in NAP5 and our hospital's standard operating procedure. The checklist was introduced, and another survey was distributed a month later to assess compliance and utility and to gain feedback. Results In the first survey, there were 39 responses. A total of 64% had seen an error with the use of TIVA. For those using TIVA 70% of the time or more, 31% had seen an error in the last three months. Twelve per cent of those who had seen errors found that the errors led to patient harm. Only 33% used a method to double-check for errors prior to commencing TIVA. In the follow-up survey, 80% of those who used the checklist had found it useful, and 30% had corrected an error while using the checklist. Eighty-seven per cent felt the checklist would prevent errors from being made. Eighty per cent of respondents said they would use the checklist in their future practice. The checklist was found to be more useful for trainees, and for those who use TIVA less often. Discussion The 'PRESS to start TIVA" checklist has been shown to be a useful tool to prevent errors and a majority of anaesthetists at our hospital plan to use it going forward. Our data suggests that anaesthetists who are less experienced with TIVA benefit more from having a checklist. There was a marked increase in the number of anaesthetists who would use a checklist in the future, compared to those who used one in the initial survey. This shows that introducing a checklist is feasible and is likely to reduce errors going forward.

摘要

全静脉麻醉(TIVA)的应用越来越广泛,然而与吸入麻醉相比,目前TIVA使用中的安全检查较少。本研究旨在评估在一家大型教学医院引入TIVA检查表的可行性和实用性。方法 向我院所有麻醉科顾问医师和实习麻醉医师发放一份关于他们使用TIVA的情况以及与TIVA使用相关的操作失误的调查问卷。根据调查中报告的常见失误、《麻醉事件第五次全国审计报告》(NAP5)中描述的失误以及我院的标准操作程序创建了一份检查表。引入该检查表,一个月后再发放另一份调查问卷,以评估检查表的依从性和实用性,并收集反馈意见。结果 在第一次调查中,共收到39份回复。总共64%的人曾见过TIVA使用中的失误。对于那些70%及以上时间使用TIVA的人,31%在过去三个月中见过失误。见过失误的人中有12%发现这些失误导致了患者伤害。只有33%的人在开始TIVA之前使用某种方法进行双重失误检查。在后续调查中,80%使用检查表的人认为它有用,30%的人在使用检查表时纠正了一个失误。87%的人认为检查表可以防止失误发生。80%的受访者表示他们会在未来的实践中使用检查表。发现检查表对实习医师以及那些较少使用TIVA的人更有用。讨论 “按下按钮开始TIVA”检查表已被证明是预防失误的有用工具,我院大多数麻醉医师计划在未来继续使用它。我们的数据表明,TIVA经验较少的麻醉医师从检查表中获益更多。与初次调查中使用检查表的麻醉医师相比,未来会使用检查表的麻醉医师数量显著增加。这表明引入检查表是可行的,并且可能会减少未来的失误。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/06c8/11008608/d69aaa572160/cureus-0016-00000056026-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验