Suppr超能文献

胃食管反流病(GERD)合并慢性咳嗽(CC)患者的食管动力和反流特征差异及标准化药物治疗的影响

Difference of Esophageal Motility and Reflux Characteristics in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Chronic Cough (CC) and the Impact of Standardized Drug Therapy.

作者信息

Liu Wenfang, Tong Yuqing

出版信息

Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Jan;31(1):354-360.

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the difference between esophageal motility and reflux characteristics in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic cough (CC) and the effect of standardized drug therapy. Eighty-four patients diagnosed with GERD in The First People's Hospital of Hangzhou from December 2020 to December 2022 were enrolled in this study. They were divided into an observation group (Obs group, patients with GERD + CC, n = 26 cases) and a control group (control group, patients with typical GERD, n = 58 cases). Reflux symptom integral questionnaire, cough symptom integral questionnaire, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), and 24-hour esophageal pH/impedance monitoring were performed. The upper esophageal sphincter pressure at resting (UESP) and distal systolic score (DCI) in the Obs group were much lower. They exhibited differences with P < .05 than those in the control group. The total numbers of proximal reflux, proximal weak acid reflux, proximal non-acid reflux, weak acid reflux, and gas-liquid mixed reflux in the Obs group were more. They showed a difference with P < .05 than those in the control group. After a standard treatment, the reflux symptom score of patients with GERD + CC was greatly lower than those of patients with typical GERD (P < .05). Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was dominant in patients with GERD +CC. HRM and 24-hour pH/impedance monitoring can objectively evaluate the properties of esophageal motility and reflux, respectively, which had a guiding significance for individual patient treatment.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨胃食管反流病(GERD)合并慢性咳嗽(CC)患者的食管动力和反流特征差异以及标准化药物治疗的效果。选取2020年12月至2022年12月在杭州市第一人民医院确诊为GERD的84例患者纳入本研究。将其分为观察组(Obs组,GERD合并CC患者,n = 26例)和对照组(对照组,典型GERD患者,n = 58例)。进行反流症状积分问卷、咳嗽症状积分问卷、高分辨率食管测压(HRM)以及24小时食管pH/阻抗监测。观察组静息时上食管括约肌压力(UESP)和远端收缩积分(DCI)明显更低。与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。观察组近端反流、近端弱酸反流、近端非酸反流、弱酸反流和气液混合反流的总数更多。与对照组相比,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。经过标准治疗后GERD合并CC患者的反流症状评分明显低于典型GERD患者(P < 0.05)。无效食管动力(IEM)在GERD合并CC患者中占主导。HRM和24小时pH/阻抗监测可分别客观评估食管动力和反流的特性,对患者个体化治疗具有指导意义。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验