• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高血压管理中数字健康技术采用的提供者和患者相关障碍及促进因素:范围审查

Provider- and Patient-Related Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption for Hypertension Management: Scoping Review.

作者信息

Palacholla Ramya Sita, Fischer Nils, Coleman Amanda, Agboola Stephen, Kirley Katherine, Felsted Jennifer, Katz Chelsea, Lloyd Stacy, Jethwani Kamal

机构信息

Partners HealthCare Pivot Labs, Boston, MA, United States.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Cardio. 2019 Mar 26;3(1):e11951. doi: 10.2196/11951.

DOI:10.2196/11951
PMID:31758771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6834226/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The uptake of digital health technology (DHT) has been surprisingly low in clinical practice. Despite showing great promise to improve patient outcomes and disease management, there is limited information on the factors that contribute to the limited adoption of DHT, particularly for hypertension management.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review provides a comprehensive summary of barriers to and facilitators of DHT adoption for hypertension management reported in the published literature with a focus on provider- and patient-related barriers and facilitators.

METHODS

This review followed the methodological framework developed by Arskey and O'Malley. Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed or Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Excerpta Medica database. Articles that reported on barriers to and/or facilitators of digital health adoption for hypertension management published in English between 2008 and 2017 were eligible. Studies not reporting on barriers or facilitators to DHT adoption for management of hypertension were excluded. A total of 2299 articles were identified based on the above criteria after removing duplicates, and they were assessed for eligibility. Of these, 2165 references did not meet the inclusion criteria. After assessing 134 studies in full text, 98 studies were excluded (full texts were either unavailable or studies did not fulfill the inclusion criteria), resulting in a final set of 32 articles. In addition, 4 handpicked articles were also included in the review, making it a total of 36 studies.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies were selected for data extraction after abstract and full-text screening by 2 independent reviewers. All conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Thematic analysis was conducted to identify major themes pertaining to barriers and facilitators of DHT from both provider and patient perspectives. The key facilitators of DHT adoption by physicians that were identified include ease of integration with clinical workflow, improvement in patient outcomes, and technology usability and technical support. Technology usability and timely technical support improved self-management and patient experience, and positive impact on patient-provider communication were most frequently reported facilitators for patients. Barriers to use of DHTs reported by physicians include lack of integration with clinical workflow, lack of validation of technology, and lack of technology usability and technical support. Finally, lack of technology usability and technical support, interference with patient-provider relationship, and lack of validation of technology were the most commonly reported barriers by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest the settings and context in which DHTs are implemented and individuals involved in implementation influence adoption. Finally, to fully realize the potential of digitally enabled hypertension management, there is a greater need to validate these technologies to provide patients and providers with reliable and accurate information on both clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd4/6834226/ee9f9cb1b0b9/cardio_v3i1e11951_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd4/6834226/ee9f9cb1b0b9/cardio_v3i1e11951_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cd4/6834226/ee9f9cb1b0b9/cardio_v3i1e11951_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

数字健康技术(DHT)在临床实践中的应用率出奇地低。尽管DHT在改善患者治疗效果和疾病管理方面显示出巨大潜力,但关于导致DHT采用受限的因素的信息有限,尤其是在高血压管理方面。

目的

本范围综述全面总结了已发表文献中报道的DHT用于高血压管理的障碍和促进因素,重点关注与提供者和患者相关的障碍和促进因素。

方法

本综述遵循Arskey和O'Malley制定的方法框架。在PubMed或医学文献分析与检索系统在线数据库、护理学与健康相关文献累积索引以及医学文摘数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。2008年至2017年期间以英文发表的报道DHT用于高血压管理的障碍和/或促进因素的文章符合要求。未报道DHT用于高血压管理的障碍或促进因素的研究被排除。根据上述标准,在去除重复项后共识别出2299篇文章,并对其进行了资格评估。其中,2165篇参考文献不符合纳入标准。在对134项研究进行全文评估后,排除了98项研究(全文不可用或研究未满足纳入标准),最终得到32篇文章。此外,还挑选了4篇文章纳入本综述,共计36项研究。

结果

经过2名独立评审员的摘要和全文筛选,共选择了36项研究进行数据提取。所有分歧均由第三名评审员解决。进行了主题分析,以从提供者和患者的角度确定与DHT的障碍和促进因素相关的主要主题。确定的医生采用DHT的关键促进因素包括易于与临床工作流程整合、改善患者治疗效果以及技术可用性和技术支持。技术可用性和及时的技术支持改善了自我管理和患者体验,对患者与提供者沟通产生积极影响是患者最常报告的促进因素。医生报告的DHT使用障碍包括与临床工作流程缺乏整合、技术未经验证以及技术可用性和技术支持不足。最后,技术可用性和技术支持不足、干扰患者与提供者的关系以及技术未经验证是患者最常报告的障碍。

结论

研究结果表明,DHT的实施环境和背景以及参与实施的个人会影响其采用。最后,为了充分实现数字化高血压管理的潜力,更需要对这些技术进行验证,以便为患者和提供者提供关于临床结果和成本效益的可靠准确信息。

相似文献

1
Provider- and Patient-Related Barriers to and Facilitators of Digital Health Technology Adoption for Hypertension Management: Scoping Review.高血压管理中数字健康技术采用的提供者和患者相关障碍及促进因素:范围审查
JMIR Cardio. 2019 Mar 26;3(1):e11951. doi: 10.2196/11951.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review.心血管护理中数字健康技术应用的障碍与促进因素:一项系统的范围综述
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2021 Feb 4;2(1):62-74. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztab005. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Facilitators and Barriers to the Implementation of Digital Health Technologies in Hospital Settings in Lower- and Middle-Income Countries Since the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review.自新冠疫情爆发以来低收入和中等收入国家医院环境中数字健康技术实施的促进因素和障碍:范围审查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 6;27:e63482. doi: 10.2196/63482.
6
Health Information Exchange.健康信息交换。
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2015 Dec(220):1-465. doi: 10.23970/AHRQEPCERTA220.
7
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
8
Barriers to and Facilitators of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Health Care: Scoping Review.医疗保健中人工智能采用的障碍和促进因素:范围综述。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 29;11:e48633. doi: 10.2196/48633.
9
Perceived facilitators and inhibitors for the use of personal digital assistants (PDAs) by nurses: a systematic review.护士使用个人数字助理(PDA)的感知促进因素和抑制因素:一项系统综述
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(33):1431-1488. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907330-00001.
10
Exploring Stakeholder Perspectives on the Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing Digital Technologies for Heart Disease Diagnosis: Qualitative Study.探索利益相关者对实施心脏病诊断数字技术的障碍和促进因素的看法:定性研究
JMIR Cardio. 2025 Mar 5;9:e66464. doi: 10.2196/66464.

引用本文的文献

1
What Matters Most to Veterans When Deciding to Use Technology for Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis of a National Survey.退伍军人在决定使用技术促进健康时最重要的因素:一项全国性调查的横断面分析
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 7;9:e77113. doi: 10.2196/77113.
2
Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives.数字健康技术的获取:个性化框架与全球视角。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41569-025-01184-5.
3
Empowering Capabilities of People With Chronic Conditions Supported by Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2018年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):e67-e492. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Adopting Telemedicine for the Self-Management of Hypertension: Systematic Review.采用远程医疗进行高血压自我管理:系统评价
JMIR Med Inform. 2017 Oct 24;5(4):e41. doi: 10.2196/medinform.6603.
3
Effectiveness of Digital Medicines to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective, Open-Label, Cluster-Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial.
数字健康技术支持下慢性病患者的能力赋能:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 27;27:e68458. doi: 10.2196/68458.
4
A systematic review of influences on engagement with remote health interventions targeting weight management for individuals living with excess weight.一项针对超重个体体重管理的远程健康干预参与度影响因素的系统评价。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1038/s41366-025-01811-8.
5
Barriers and Facilitators of Digital Health Use for Self-Management of Hypertensive Disorders by Black Pregnant Women.黑人孕妇使用数字健康进行高血压疾病自我管理的障碍与促进因素
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:433-442. eCollection 2024.
6
Stakeholder perceptions on institutional design of digital health regulatory frameworks: insights from Kenya, Rwanda and Uganda.利益相关者对数字健康监管框架制度设计的看法:来自肯尼亚、卢旺达和乌干达的见解
Oxf Open Digit Health. 2025 May 9;3:oqaf010. doi: 10.1093/oodh/oqaf010. eCollection 2025.
7
Professional-Facing Digital Health Technology for the Care of Patients With Chronic Pain: Scoping Review.面向专业人士的慢性疼痛患者护理数字健康技术:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 14;27:e66457. doi: 10.2196/66457.
8
High-Touch vs Low-Touch Strategy for Implementing a CRC Screening Digital Health Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.实施结直肠癌筛查数字健康干预的高接触与低接触策略:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0779.
9
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding hypertension diet among patients with hypertension.高血压患者对高血压饮食的认知、态度和行为。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 7;15(1):11915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97016-0.
10
Implementation of mHealth to support cancer diagnosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.在撒哈拉以南非洲地区实施移动健康技术以支持癌症诊断:一项系统综述。
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med. 2025 Mar 5;17(1):e1-e13. doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v17i1.4683.
数字药物改善血压控制不佳的高血压患者和2型糖尿病患者临床结局的有效性:前瞻性、开放标签、整群随机试验性临床试验
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 11;19(7):e246. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7833.
4
Changes in Hospital Quality Associated with Hospital Value-Based Purchasing.与医院基于价值的采购相关的医院质量变化
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 15;376(24):2358-2366. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1613412.
5
Physicians In Medicare ACOs Offer Mixed Views Of Model For Health Care Cost And Quality.在联邦医疗保险管理式医疗机构(ACO)中的医生对医疗成本和质量模式看法不一。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Apr 1;36(4):649-654. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1427.
6
Understanding factors influencing the adoption of mHealth by the elderly: An extension of the UTAUT model.理解影响老年人采用移动健康技术的因素:技术接受与使用统一理论模型的扩展
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Using digital interventions for self-management of chronic physical health conditions: A meta-ethnography review of published studies.使用数字干预手段进行慢性身体健康状况的自我管理:已发表研究的元民族志综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Apr;100(4):616-635. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.019. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
CDC Grand Rounds: A Public Health Approach to Detect and Control Hypertension.美国疾病控制与预防中心例会:公共卫生方法检测和控制高血压。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Nov 18;65(45):1261-1264. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6545a3.
9
What influences patients' acceptance of a blood pressure telemonitoring service in primary care? A qualitative study.在初级保健中,哪些因素会影响患者对血压远程监测服务的接受度?一项定性研究。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Jan 27;10:99-106. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S94687. eCollection 2016.
10
A Brief, Multifaceted, Generic Intervention to Improve Blood Pressure Control and Reduce Disparities Had Little Effect.一项简短、多方面、通用的干预措施,旨在改善血压控制和减少差异,但效果甚微。
Ethn Dis. 2016 Jan 21;26(1):27-36. doi: 10.18865/ed.26.1.27.