• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PRESERFLO™ 微分流器:25号与27号针道的1年结果

PRESERFLO™ Microshunt: 1-Year Results of a 25-Gauge vs. 27-Gauge Needle Tract.

作者信息

Steiner Stefan, Resch Hemma, Kiss Barbara, Vass Clemens

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Department of Ophthalmology, Sanatorium Hera, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 29;13(7):1979. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071979.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13071979
PMID:38610744
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11012831/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the PreserFlo™ microshunt (PMS) using a 25-Gauge vs. 27-Gauge needle tract. : This is a prospective postoperative examination of 60 glaucoma eyes that received a PMS. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), glaucoma drug score (GDS), Kaplan-Meier success rates, complications, and secondary intervention rates. Two subgroups were formed for data comparison: 27-Gauge (27G), and 25-Gauge (25G). Success was defined as IOP < 18 mmHg together with ≥20% IOP reduction with medication allowed (qualified success = QS18) or not (full success = FS18). : IOP and GDS were reduced from baseline to the 1-year study visit as follows: All eyes from 23.4 ± 8.6 mmHg (3.1 ± 0.9) to 15.1 ± 5.9 mmHg (0.8 ± 1.1); 25G from 24.2 ± 7.3 mmHg (3.0 ± 0.8) to 12.7 ± 2.7 mmHg (0.5 ± 0.8); and 27G from 23.1 ± 9.2 mmHg (3.1 ± 1.0) to 16.2 ± 6.7 mmHg (0.9 ± 1.2). IOP at one year was lower in the 25G group compared to the 27G group ( = 0.035). Bleb needling was required in eight (13.3%) eyes and open bleb revisions in three (5.0%). Transient hypotony occurred in 21% and choroidal effusion in 8% of all eyes. Choroidal effusions were more frequent in the 25G group (21%) compared to the 27G group (2%, = 0.031). One-year success rates were significantly higher in the 25G group compared to the 27G group for both QS18 (25G: 67.9% vs. 27G: 35.7%, = 0.002) and FS18 (25G: 63.6% vs. 27G: 29.2%, = 0.007). : The PreserFlo microshunt is an effective and safe glaucoma surgery with a low rate of bleb revisions or needlings. We show that the 25G needle tract might be more efficient for IOP control at the cost of increased IOP-related complications compared to 27G.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估使用25号与27号针道的PreserFlo™微型分流器(PMS)的有效性和安全性。这是一项对60只接受PMS的青光眼患眼进行的前瞻性术后检查。主要观察指标为眼压(IOP)、青光眼药物评分(GDS)、Kaplan-Meier成功率、并发症及二次干预率。为进行数据比较形成了两个亚组:27号(27G)和25号(25G)。成功定义为眼压<18 mmHg且允许使用药物使眼压降低≥20%(合格成功=QS18)或未使用药物使眼压降低≥20%(完全成功=FS18)。眼压和GDS从基线至1年研究访视时的降低情况如下:所有患眼从23.4±8.6 mmHg(3.1±0.9)降至15.1±5.9 mmHg(0.8±1.1);25G组从24.2±7.3 mmHg(3.0±0.8)降至12.7±2.7 mmHg(0.5±0.8);27G组从23.1±9.2 mmHg(3.1±1.0)降至16.2±6.7 mmHg(0.9±1.2)。25G组1年时的眼压低于27G组(P=0.035)。8只(13.3%)患眼需要进行滤泡针刺,3只(5.0%)需要进行开放滤泡修复。所有患眼中21%出现短暂性低眼压,8%出现脉络膜渗漏。25G组脉络膜渗漏(21%)比27G组(2%,P=0.031)更常见。25G组QS18(25G:67.9% vs. 27G:35.7%,P=0.002)和FS18(25G:63.6% vs. 27G:29.2%,P=0.007)的1年成功率均显著高于27G组。PreserFlo微型分流器是一种有效且安全的青光眼手术,滤泡修复或针刺率低。我们发现,与27G相比,25G针道可能在控制眼压方面更有效,但代价是增加了与眼压相关的并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8004/11012831/7c3e3aa1b635/jcm-13-01979-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8004/11012831/8868c4a796bf/jcm-13-01979-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8004/11012831/7c3e3aa1b635/jcm-13-01979-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8004/11012831/8868c4a796bf/jcm-13-01979-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8004/11012831/7c3e3aa1b635/jcm-13-01979-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
PRESERFLO™ Microshunt: 1-Year Results of a 25-Gauge vs. 27-Gauge Needle Tract.PRESERFLO™ 微分流器:25号与27号针道的1年结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 29;13(7):1979. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071979.
2
PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Combined with Phacoemulsification versus PreserFlo™ MicroShunt as a Standalone Procedure in Patients with Medically Resistant Open-Angle Glaucoma.PreserFlo™微分流器联合超声乳化术与PreserFlo™微分流器单独用于药物难治性开角型青光眼患者的疗效比较
J Curr Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 26;34(2):180-186. doi: 10.4103/joco.joco_298_21. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
3
PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Versus Trabeculectomy in Patients With Moderate to Advanced Open-Angle Glaucoma: 12-Month Follow-Up of a Single-Center Prospective Study.PreserFlo™ 微分流器与小梁切除术治疗中重度开角型青光眼患者:单中心前瞻性研究的12个月随访
Cureus. 2022 Aug 23;14(8):e28288. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28288. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
PreserFlo™ MicroShunt Versus Ab Externo Canaloplasty in Patients With Moderate to Advanced Open-Angle Glaucoma: 12-Month Follow-Up of a Single-Center Retrospective Study.PreserFlo™ 微型分流器与外路巩膜瓣切开术治疗中重度开角型青光眼的疗效比较:单中心回顾性研究的12个月随访
Cureus. 2023 Feb 19;15(2):e35185. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35185. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
XEN Gel Stent compared to PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt implantation for primary open-angle glaucoma: two-year results.XEN 凝胶支架与 PRESERFLO™ 微分流管植入治疗原发性开角型青光眼:两年结果。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 May;99(3):e433-e440. doi: 10.1111/aos.14602. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Safety and Efficacy of the Preserflo Microshunt in Refractory Glaucoma: A One-Year Study.Preserflo微分流器治疗难治性青光眼的安全性和有效性:一项为期一年的研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 29;11(23):7086. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237086.
7
Short-term safety and efficacy of Preserflo™ Microshunt in glaucoma patients: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.保视优微导管在青光眼患者中的短期安全性和有效性:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Mar;37(4):644-649. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-01995-7. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
8
Device-modified trabeculectomy for glaucoma.器械改良小梁切除术治疗青光眼。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 13;3(3):CD010472. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010472.pub3.
9
PRESERFLO ™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: 1-year results on efficacy and safety.PRESERFLO ™ 微分流管与小梁切除术:疗效和安全性的 1 年结果。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct;261(10):2901-2915. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06075-4. Epub 2023 May 3.
10
Preserflo TM MicroShunt implantation combined with Ologen TM in primary and secondary glaucoma patients in a clinical setting.在临床环境中,将 PreserfloTM 微分流管植入与 OlogenTM 联合应用于原发性和继发性青光眼患者。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 1;72(3):417-426. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1502_23. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and safety of the XEN45 gel stent compared to trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma: the Gold-Standard Pathway Study.在原发性开角型青光眼中,XEN45凝胶支架与小梁切除术相比的有效性和安全性:金标准路径研究
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Feb 6;10(1):e001696. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001696.
2
One-Year Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of PreserFlo MicroShunt with Mitomycin C Applied by Sub-Tenon Injection Versus Sponge.PreserFlo微型分流器联合丝裂霉素C经颞下注射与海绵应用的疗效及安全性的一年比较
Ophthalmol Ther. 2025 Jan;14(1):153-167. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01074-y. Epub 2024 Nov 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of the Preserflo Microshunt With Mitomycin C for the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma.保视宁微管与丝裂霉素 C 联合治疗开角型青光眼的疗效和安全性。
J Glaucoma. 2022 Jul 1;31(7):557-566. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002052. Epub 2022 May 17.
2
One-year surgical outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in glaucoma: a multicentre analysis.青光眼 PreserFlo 微分流管的一年手术结果:一项多中心分析。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;107(8):1104-1111. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320631. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
3
Comparison of subconjunctival microinvasive glaucoma surgery and trabeculectomy.
比较经结膜微创青光眼手术与小梁切除术。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 Aug;100(5):e1120-e1126. doi: 10.1111/aos.15042. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
4
Preliminary results of Preserflo Microshunt versus Preserflo Microshunt and Ologen implantation.Preserflo微型分流器与Preserflo微型分流器及Ologen植入术的初步结果。
Eye Vis (Lond). 2021 Sep 3;8(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40662-021-00253-3.
5
Effectiveness of MicroShunt in Patients with Primary Open-Angle and Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma: A Retrospective European Multicenter Study.微分流术治疗原发性开角型青光眼和剥脱性青光眼患者的有效性:一项欧洲多中心回顾性研究
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Mar-Apr;5(2):210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.08.005. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
6
One-year outcomes of microshunt implantation in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼行微导管植入术后 1 年的疗效观察。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 27;16(8):e0256670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256670. eCollection 2021.
7
PRESERFLO™ MicroShunt versus trabeculectomy: first results on efficacy and safety.PRESERFLO™微型分流器与小梁切除术:疗效和安全性的初步结果
Acta Ophthalmol. 2022 May;100(3):e779-e790. doi: 10.1111/aos.14968. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
8
Safety and Effectiveness of the PRESERFLO® MicroShunt in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Results from a 2-Year Multicenter Study.PRESERFLO® MicroShunt 在原发性开角型青光眼的安全性和有效性:来自一项为期 2 年的多中心研究的结果。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Mar-Apr;5(2):195-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.008. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
9
Ab-Externo MicroShunt versus Trabeculectomy in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: One-Year Results from a 2-Year Randomized, Multicenter Study.外引流微管植入术与小梁切除术治疗原发性开角型青光眼:一项为期 2 年的随机、多中心研究的 1 年结果。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Dec;128(12):1710-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 May 27.
10
Needling and open filtering bleb revision after XEN-45 implantation-a retrospective outcome comparison.XEN-45 植入术后针刺和开放滤过泡修复的回顾性结果比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;259(9):2761-2770. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05204-1. Epub 2021 May 11.