Suppr超能文献

修复与替换破损牙齿修复体的结果差异的体外分析

In Vitro Analysis of Outcome Differences Between Repairing and Replacing Broken Dental Restorations.

作者信息

Sachan Saraswati, De Raktim, Balivada Akshita, Pandey Soni, Tiwari Neeraj K, Franklin Supurna, Ganiga Channaiah Shivakumar, Siddiqui Shazia

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Tooth Corner Dental Clinic and Endodontic Centre, Agartala, IND.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Mar 13;16(3):e56071. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56071. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Objective In light of several advancements and considerations in endodontic dentistry, there still remains a need to comprehensively evaluate the outcome disparities between repairing and replacing broken dental restorations. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of repairing dental restorations versus replacing them, focusing on how each method affects the structural strength and longevity of the restorations. Methods The study included 60 freshly removed human maxillary premolars. Initial processing involved rigorous washing, descaling, and polishing of the teeth. To ensure preservation, the specimens were stored in sterile, distilled water. To occlude the root canals, a self-hardening composite resin was used, and the roots were coated with two coats of clear nail polish to prevent moisture penetration. A 245 carbide bur attached to a high-speed dental handpiece with air and water spray cooling produced standardized Class II cavities on the occluso-proximal surfaces. Each cavity had a buccolingual breadth of 2 mm, an occluso-cervical length of 4 mm, and a gingival boundary that was 1 mm coronal to the cement-enamel junction. Following this preparation, the teeth were randomly separated into three groups (Group A, Group B, and Group C), each containing 20 teeth. Results Our analysis showed that teeth with entirely replaced restorations had a higher average fracture resistance than those with repaired restorations. However, the difference in fracture resistance between the repair and replacement groups for each type of material was not statistically significant. Conclusion Based on the findings, repairing a dental restoration can be a conservative and less invasive alternative to a full replacement without a significant compromise in the restoration's ability to withstand fracture. Therefore, dental professionals might consider full restoration as a viable option, taking into account the need to preserve dental tissue as well as the restoration's durability and structural integrity.

摘要

目的 鉴于牙髓病学的多项进展和考虑因素,仍然需要全面评估修复与替换破损牙齿修复体之间的疗效差异。本研究旨在比较修复牙齿修复体与替换修复体的有效性,重点关注每种方法如何影响修复体的结构强度和使用寿命。方法 该研究纳入了60颗新鲜拔除的人类上颌前磨牙。初始处理包括对牙齿进行严格的清洗、除垢和抛光。为确保保存,标本储存在无菌蒸馏水中。为封闭根管,使用了一种自固化复合树脂,并且在牙根上涂了两层透明指甲油以防止水分渗透。使用连接到高速牙科手机上的245号硬质合金车针并配备空气和水喷雾冷却,在咬合 - 邻面制备标准化的II类洞。每个洞的颊舌宽度为2毫米,咬合 - 牙颈部长度为4毫米,牙龈边界位于牙骨质 - 釉质界冠方1毫米处。完成此制备后,将牙齿随机分为三组(A组、B组和C组),每组包含20颗牙齿。结果 我们的分析表明,完全替换修复体的牙齿比修复修复体的牙齿具有更高的平均抗折强度。然而,每种材料的修复组和替换组之间的抗折强度差异无统计学意义。结论 根据研究结果,修复牙齿修复体可以是一种保守且侵入性较小的替代完全替换的方法,而不会在修复体的抗折能力上有显著折衷。因此,牙科专业人员在考虑保留牙齿组织以及修复体的耐久性和结构完整性的需求时,可能会将完全修复视为一种可行的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验