Mckilliam Andy
Cognition and Philosophy Lab, Monash Centre for Consciousness and Contemplative Studies, Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Room 429, 29 Ancora Imparo Way, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia.
Neurosci Conscious. 2024 Apr 5;2024(1):niae014. doi: 10.1093/nc/niae014. eCollection 2024.
A central project for the neuroscience of consciousness is to reveal the neural basis of consciousness. For the past 20-odd years, this project has been conceptualized in terms of minimal sufficiency. Recently, a number of authors have suggested that the project is better conceived in mechanistic terms as the search for difference-makers. In this paper, I (i) motivate this mechanistic alternative to minimal sufficiency, (ii) develop it further by clarifying debates about the prospects of leveraging mutual manipulability to distinguish constitutive difference-makers from those that are merely causal, and (iii) explore the implications this has for recent debates concerning the status of the prefrontal cortex. I argue that adopting a mechanistic approach to the neuroscience of consciousness suggests that the prefrontal cortex is part of the neural mechanisms underlying consciousness even if it is not strictly speaking a necessary part.
意识神经科学的一个核心项目是揭示意识的神经基础。在过去二十多年里,该项目一直依据最小充分性来进行概念化。最近,一些作者提出,该项目从机制角度来理解会更好,即把它视为寻找差异制造者的过程。在本文中,我(i)推动用这种机制性替代方案取代最小充分性,(ii)通过阐明有关利用相互可操作性来区分构成性差异制造者和仅仅是因果性差异制造者的前景的争论,进一步发展该方案,并且(iii)探讨这对近期有关前额叶皮质地位的争论有何影响。我认为,对意识神经科学采用一种机制性方法表明,前额叶皮质是意识所依赖的神经机制的一部分,即便严格来讲它并非必要部分。