Owen Matthew, Guta Mihretu P
Department of Philosophy, Gonzaga University, Spokane, WA, United States.
Department of Philosophy, Biola University, La Mirada, CA, United States.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Jul 4;13:24. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2019.00024. eCollection 2019.
Neural correlates of consciousness (for brevity NCC) are foundational to the scientific study of consciousness. Chalmers (2000) has provided the most informative and influential definition of NCC, according to which neural correlates are minimally for consciousness. However, the sense of sufficiency needs further clarification since there are several relevant senses with different entailments. In section one of this article, we give an overview of the desiderata for a good definition of NCC and Chalmers's definition. The second section analyses the merit of understanding the sufficiency of neural correlates for corresponding consciousness according to three relevant types of sufficiency: logical, metaphysical, and physical. In section three, a theoretical approach to consciousness studies is suggested in light of the sense in which NCC are sufficient for consciousness. Section four addresses a concern some might have about this approach. By the end, it will become apparent that our conception of NCC has important implications for research methodology, neuroethics, and the vitality of the search for NCC.
意识的神经关联(简称为NCC)是意识科学研究的基础。查尔默斯(2000)给出了关于NCC最具信息量和影响力的定义,据此,神经关联至少是意识的 。然而,充分性的概念需要进一步澄清,因为存在几种具有不同含义的相关意义。在本文的第一部分,我们概述了一个好的NCC定义的必要条件以及查尔默斯的定义。第二部分根据三种相关的充分性类型:逻辑充分性、形而上学充分性和物理充分性,分析了理解神经关联对于相应意识的充分性的优点。在第三部分,根据NCC对意识具有充分性的意义,提出了一种意识研究的理论方法。第四部分解决了一些人可能对这种方法存在的担忧。到最后,我们会发现我们对NCC的概念对研究方法、神经伦理学以及寻找NCC的活力具有重要意义。 (注:原文中“neural correlates are minimally for consciousness”此处表述似乎不完整)