Suppr超能文献

对新西兰跨文化教育排他性方法的批判。

A Critique of New Zealand's Exclusive Approach to Intercultural Education.

作者信息

Salahshour Neda

机构信息

Research Development Leader, The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z J Educ Stud. 2021;56(1):111-128. doi: 10.1007/s40841-020-00179-9. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

Abstract

This article examines the intercultural initiatives, programmes and strategy documents in New Zealand education to answer the following two questions: What intercultural policies and strategy documents are offered to New Zealand schools and teachers to accommodate their diverse communities? Which communities do they include and/or exclude? It explores and discusses paradigms, policies and curriculum developments that have been developed to address the growing levels of diversity in New Zealand's schools and identifies some of the current significant gaps. This article argues that within the dominant Anglo-European framework, there are increasing intercultural initiatives supporting Māori and Pasifika communities within New Zealand schools but there are very limited policies and initiatives addressing the wider diverse communities. I argue that policies and initiatives should be all-encompassing, comprehensive and inclusive; that is, they must fairly encompass members of the society and not be limited solely to specific groups. Moreover, the current policy statements are implemented in an ad hoc manner i.e. they are not supported through the systematic resource banks, leadership, teacher education and training and enabling strategies required to create societies that are more inclusive, with respectful intercultural relations. This article will be of interest to policy makers at a national level, those who work in schools and centres, and teacher educators who have a concern for the inclusion of ethnocultural minorities and intercultural education.

摘要

本文审视了新西兰教育领域的跨文化倡议、项目及战略文件,以回答以下两个问题:新西兰学校和教师可获得哪些跨文化政策及战略文件,以接纳其多元的社区?这些政策和文件涵盖了哪些社区,又排除了哪些社区?本文探讨并讨论了为应对新西兰学校日益增长的多样性而制定的范式、政策及课程发展情况,并指出了当前一些显著的差距。本文认为,在占主导地位的盎格鲁-欧洲框架内,新西兰学校中有越来越多支持毛利族和太平洋岛国裔社区的跨文化倡议,但针对更广泛多元社区的政策和倡议却非常有限。我认为政策和倡议应具有全面性、综合性和包容性;也就是说,它们必须公平地涵盖社会成员,而不仅限于特定群体。此外,当前的政策声明是以临时方式实施的,即它们没有通过创建更具包容性、拥有相互尊重的跨文化关系的社会所需的系统资源库、领导力、教师教育与培训以及赋能策略来提供支持。本文将引起国家层面的政策制定者、学校和教育中心的工作人员以及关注族裔文化少数群体融入和跨文化教育的教师教育工作者的兴趣。

相似文献

1
A Critique of New Zealand's Exclusive Approach to Intercultural Education.
N Z J Educ Stud. 2021;56(1):111-128. doi: 10.1007/s40841-020-00179-9. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
4
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
5
Universal healthcare for all? Māori health inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand, 1975-2000.
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Feb;319:115315. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115315. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
6
Infant mortality inequities for Māori in New Zealand: a tale of three policies.
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01340-y.
9
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to and Recommendations for Equitable Access to Healthcare for Migrants and Refugees in Aotearoa, New Zealand: An Integrative Review.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2024 Feb;26(1):164-180. doi: 10.1007/s10903-023-01528-8. Epub 2023 Sep 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Interculturalism in the post-multicultural debate: a defence.
Comp Migr Stud. 2017;5(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0057-z. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验