• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碳排放交易能否提高区域生态效率?基于环境创新视角。

Can carbon emission trading improve regional eco-efficiency? Based on the environmental innovation perspective.

机构信息

School of Economics, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, 510320, China.

School of Finance, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, 510320, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(21):31081-31096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33102-6. Epub 2024 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-024-33102-6
PMID:38625465
Abstract

This paper uses green innovation and environmental pollution as the mediating variables to construct a mediating effect model to investigate whether China's carbon emission trading policy can improve regional eco-efficiency by reducing regional environmental pollution and stimulating green innovation. This study is based on panel data from 30 provinces and municipalities directly under China's central government and autonomous regions from 2003 to 2019. The eco-efficiency of these provinces is measured using the super-efficiency DEA model and the difference-in-difference method (DID). The results show that (1) China's emission trading policy significantly improves regional ecological efficiency and the per capita GDP. The improvement can effectively improve regional ecological efficiency. (2) The mediating effect of green innovation and environmental pollution is significant. That is, China's carbon emission trading policy further improves regional ecological efficiency by stimulating more green innovation and reducing the synergy brought by environmental pollution. (3) There are differences in the feedback of this impact mechanism between different regions: It shows the characteristics of the western region being more significant than the eastern region. The central region has no significant effect. The research conclusion can provide a policy reference for the subsequent unified promotion of the construction of a carbon emission trading market nationwide and a theoretical basis for helping to achieve the "dual carbon" goal.

摘要

本文以绿色创新和环境污染为中介变量,构建中介效应模型,探讨中国碳排放交易政策能否通过减少区域环境污染和刺激绿色创新来提高区域生态效率。本研究基于 2003 年至 2019 年中国 30 个省、自治区和直辖市的面板数据。采用超效率 DEA 模型和双重差分法(DID)衡量这些省份的生态效率。结果表明:(1)中国的排放交易政策显著提高了区域生态效率和人均 GDP。这种改善可以有效地提高区域生态效率。(2)绿色创新和环境污染的中介效应显著。也就是说,中国的碳排放交易政策通过刺激更多的绿色创新和减少环境污染带来的协同作用,进一步提高了区域生态效率。(3)这种影响机制的反馈在不同地区存在差异:西部地区比东部地区更为显著,中部地区则没有显著影响。研究结论可以为全国统一推进碳排放交易市场建设提供政策参考,为实现“双碳”目标提供理论依据。

相似文献

1
Can carbon emission trading improve regional eco-efficiency? Based on the environmental innovation perspective.碳排放交易能否提高区域生态效率?基于环境创新视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(21):31081-31096. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33102-6. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
The effect of China's carbon emission trading on eco-efficiency: an empirical study at the city level.中国碳排放交易对生态效率的影响:基于城市层面的实证研究
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(56):84827-84843. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21617-9. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
3
Governance effects of pollution reduction and carbon mitigation of carbon emission trading policy in China.中国碳排放交易政策在减少污染和碳减排方面的治理效应。
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 4):119074. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119074. Epub 2024 May 4.
4
Impacts of pilot carbon emission trading policies on urban environmental pollution: Evidence from China.试点碳交易政策对城市环境污染的影响:来自中国的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 May;359:121016. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121016. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Does emission trading system improve the urban land green use efficiency? Empirical evidence from Chinese cities.排放交易系统是否能提高城市土地绿色利用效率?来自中国城市的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(58):121666-121683. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30678-3. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
6
Does China's carbon emission trading policy improve regional energy efficiency?-an analysis based on quasi-experimental and policy spillover effects.中国的碳排放交易政策是否提高了区域能源效率?——基于准实验和政策溢出效应的分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(14):21166-21183. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17021-4. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
7
Evaluation of carbon emission reduction effect and porter effect of China's carbon trading policy.中国碳交易政策的碳排放减少效应与波特效应评估
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(16):46527-46546. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25593-6. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
8
How does carbon emission trading scheme affect enterprise green technology innovation: evidence from China's A-share non-financial listed companies.碳排放交易计划如何影响企业绿色技术创新:来自中国A股非金融上市公司的证据
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):35588-35601. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24768-x. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
9
Impact on Carbon Intensity of Carbon Emission Trading-Evidence from a Pilot Program in 281 Cities in China.中国 281 个城市碳交易试点对碳强度的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12483. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912483.
10
Is Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) an Effective Market-Incentivized Environmental Regulation Policy? Evidence from China's Eight ETS Pilots.碳排放交易体系(ETS)是一种有效的市场激励型环境监管政策吗?来自中国八个碳排放交易试点的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 8;19(6):3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063177.