• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习在互联网金融风险管理中的应用:系统文献综述。

Machine learning in internet financial risk management: A systematic literature review.

机构信息

Science and Technology Finance Key Laboratory of Hebei Province, Hebei Finance University, Baoding, Hebei, China.

Faculty of Management, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Baru, Malaysia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0300195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300195. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0300195
PMID:38625972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11020399/
Abstract

Internet finance has permeated into myriad households, bringing about lifestyle convenience alongside potential risks. Presently, internet finance enterprises are progressively adopting machine learning and other artificial intelligence methods for risk alertness. What is the current status of the application of various machine learning models and algorithms across different institutions? Is there an optimal machine learning algorithm suited for the majority of internet finance platforms and application scenarios? Scholars have embarked on a series of studies addressing these questions; however, the focus predominantly lies in comparing different algorithms within specific platforms and contexts, lacking a comprehensive discourse and summary on the utilization of machine learning in this domain. Thus, based on the data from Web of Science and Scopus databases, this paper conducts a systematic literature review on all aspects of machine learning in internet finance risk in recent years, based on publications trends, geographical distribution, literature focus, machine learning models and algorithms, and evaluations. The research reveals that machine learning, as a nascent technology, whether through basic algorithms or intricate algorithmic combinations, has made significant strides compared to traditional credit scoring methods in predicting accuracy, time efficiency, and robustness in internet finance risk management. Nonetheless, there exist noticeable disparities among different algorithms, and factors such as model structure, sample data, and parameter settings also influence prediction accuracy, although generally, updated algorithms tend to achieve higher accuracy. Consequently, there is no one-size-fits-all approach applicable to all platforms; each platform should enhance its machine learning models and algorithms based on its unique characteristics, data, and the development of AI technology, starting from key evaluation indicators to mitigate internet finance risks.

摘要

互联网金融已经渗透到千家万户,给人们的生活带来便利的同时也带来了潜在的风险。目前,互联网金融企业正在逐步采用机器学习和其他人工智能方法进行风险预警。不同机构对各种机器学习模型和算法的应用现状如何?是否有一种适用于大多数互联网金融平台和应用场景的最优机器学习算法?学者们已经对这些问题进行了一系列研究;然而,这些研究主要集中在比较特定平台和上下文中的不同算法,缺乏对该领域机器学习应用的全面论述和总结。因此,本文基于 Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库的数据,对近年来互联网金融风险中机器学习的各个方面进行了系统的文献综述,包括出版物趋势、地理分布、文献重点、机器学习模型和算法以及评价。研究发现,机器学习作为一种新兴技术,无论是基本算法还是复杂的算法组合,在预测准确性、时间效率和互联网金融风险管理的稳健性方面,都比传统的信用评分方法有了显著的进步。然而,不同算法之间存在明显的差异,模型结构、样本数据和参数设置等因素也会影响预测准确性,尽管一般来说,更新的算法往往能达到更高的准确性。因此,没有一种适用于所有平台的一刀切的方法;每个平台都应根据其独特的特点、数据和人工智能技术的发展,增强其机器学习模型和算法,从关键评估指标入手,降低互联网金融风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/11020399/b21717779d17/pone.0300195.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/11020399/778c069a38ba/pone.0300195.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/11020399/14118d3d4e56/pone.0300195.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/11020399/b21717779d17/pone.0300195.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/11020399/778c069a38ba/pone.0300195.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/11020399/14118d3d4e56/pone.0300195.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/11020399/b21717779d17/pone.0300195.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning in internet financial risk management: A systematic literature review.机器学习在互联网金融风险管理中的应用:系统文献综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0300195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300195. eCollection 2024.
2
Research on Supply Chain Financial Risk Prevention Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的供应链金融风险防范研究。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2023 Mar 6;2023:6531154. doi: 10.1155/2023/6531154. eCollection 2023.
3
Logistics Finance Collaborative Development Model Based on Machine Learning.基于机器学习的物流金融协同发展模型。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 24;2022:1591371. doi: 10.1155/2022/1591371. eCollection 2022.
4
Modern finance through quantum computing-A systematic literature review.现代金融中的量子计算——系统文献综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 18;19(7):e0304317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304317. eCollection 2024.
5
Examining the research taxonomy of artificial intelligence, deep learning & machine learning in the financial sphere-a bibliometric analysis.审视金融领域人工智能、深度学习与机器学习的研究分类——一项文献计量分析。
Qual Quant. 2023 May 2:1-30. doi: 10.1007/s11135-023-01673-0.
6
Analysis and Prediction of Corporate Finance and Exchange Rate Correlation Based on Machine Learning Algorithms.基于机器学习算法的公司财务与汇率相关性分析与预测。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jun 24;2022:2850604. doi: 10.1155/2022/2850604. eCollection 2022.
7
Does the Presence of Missing Data Affect the Performance of the SORG Machine-learning Algorithm for Patients With Spinal Metastasis? Development of an Internet Application Algorithm.缺失数据的存在是否会影响 SORG 机器学习算法在脊柱转移瘤患者中的性能?开发一种互联网应用算法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jan 1;482(1):143-157. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002706. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
8
Machine learning algorithms for the prognostication of abdominal aortic aneurysm progression: a systematic review.机器学习算法在腹主动脉瘤进展预测中的应用:系统综述。
Minerva Surg. 2024 Apr;79(2):219-227. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5691.23.10130-4. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
9
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
10
Prediction models applying machine learning to oral cavity cancer outcomes: A systematic review.应用机器学习预测口腔癌结局的模型:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Oct;154:104557. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104557. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep learning for enhanced risk management: a novel approach to analyzing financial reports.用于强化风险管理的深度学习:一种分析财务报告的新方法。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2025 Jan 27;11:e2661. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2661. eCollection 2025.
2
Correction: Machine learning in internet financial risk management: A systematic literature review.更正:互联网金融风险管理中的机器学习:一项系统的文献综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0306364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306364. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Assay of renewable energy transition: A systematic literature review.可再生能源转型评估:系统文献综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Aug 10;833:155159. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155159. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
2
Internet Financial Data Security and Economic Risk Prevention for Android Application Privacy Leakage Detection.安卓应用隐私泄露检测中的互联网金融数据安全和经济风险防范。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Mar 24;2022:6782281. doi: 10.1155/2022/6782281. eCollection 2022.
3
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews.
PRISMA-S:用于在系统评价中报告文献检索的 PRISMA 声明扩展。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2021 Apr 1;109(2):174-200. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2021.962.
4
Explainable AI in Fintech Risk Management.金融科技风险管理中的可解释人工智能
Front Artif Intell. 2020 Apr 24;3:26. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.00026. eCollection 2020.
5
Fintech Risk Management: A Research Challenge for Artificial Intelligence in Finance.金融科技风险管理:金融领域人工智能面临的一项研究挑战。
Front Artif Intell. 2018 Nov 27;1:1. doi: 10.3389/frai.2018.00001. eCollection 2018.
6
Deep Learning Spectroscopy: Neural Networks for Molecular Excitation Spectra.深度学习光谱学:用于分子激发光谱的神经网络
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2019 Jan 29;6(9):1801367. doi: 10.1002/advs.201801367. eCollection 2019 May 3.
7
Five steps to conducting a systematic review.进行系统评价的五个步骤。
J R Soc Med. 2003 Mar;96(3):118-21. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600304.