• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

交叉指征性前内侧骨关节炎中 HTO 和 UKA 的临床效果的年龄分层分析。

Age-stratified analysis of HTO and UKA clinical effects in cross-indicated anterior medial osteoarthritis.

机构信息

Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 12, Changjia Lane, Jingzhong Street, Mianyang, 621000, China.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2421-2427. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03944-4. Epub 2024 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-024-03944-4
PMID:38627286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11291513/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare clinical outcomes of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for anterior medial osteoarthritis (AMOA) as well as offer surgical recommendations through age stratification.

METHODS

Between May 2019 and May 2021, 68 cross-indicated AMOA patients were analyzed. The patients were divided into HTO and UKA groups and further into two age groups of 55-60 and 60-65 years. Additionally, general data, visual analog scale (VAS) score, and Hospital for Special Surgery knee score (HSS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed up for 18 months. Knee joint HSS significantly improved, and VAS score decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). In the 55-60 age group, HTO showed superior knee HSS at 1 and 3 months (P < 0.05), with no significant difference at 6, 12, and 18 months. HTO had a significantly lower VAS score at one month, and the VAS scores of the two groups decreased gradually with no significant difference. In the 60-65 age group, the UKA group showed superior knee joint HSS at one month, with no significant difference at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. The UKA group had a significantly lower VAS score at one month, and both groups' VAS scores decreased gradually with no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Both methods yield satisfactory results for AMOA cross-indications, improving knee joint function. The observed recovery trends have implications for personalized surgical recommendations, guiding interventions based on age-specific considerations for optimal outcomes in anterior medial osteoarthritis cases.

摘要

目的

比较高位胫骨截骨术(HTO)和单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)治疗前内侧骨关节炎(AMOA)的临床效果,并通过年龄分层为手术提供建议。

方法

回顾性分析 2019 年 5 月至 2021 年 5 月间的 68 例交叉指征 AMOA 患者。将患者分为 HTO 组和 UKA 组,并进一步分为 55-60 岁和 60-65 岁两个年龄组。同时分析一般资料、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和美国特种外科医院膝关节评分(HSS)。

结果

所有患者均获得 18 个月随访。两组患者膝关节 HSS 评分均显著提高,VAS 评分均降低(P<0.05)。在 55-60 岁年龄组,HTO 在术后 1 和 3 个月时膝关节 HSS 评分较高(P<0.05),而在术后 6、12 和 18 个月时无显著差异。HTO 在术后 1 个月时 VAS 评分较低,两组 VAS 评分逐渐降低,无显著差异。在 60-65 岁年龄组,UKA 组在术后 1 个月时膝关节 HSS 评分较高,而在术后 3、6、12 和 18 个月时无显著差异。UKA 组在术后 1 个月时 VAS 评分较低,两组 VAS 评分逐渐降低,无显著差异。

结论

两种方法均能有效改善 AMOA 交叉指征患者膝关节功能,获得满意疗效。观察到的恢复趋势提示应根据年龄制定个性化手术建议,针对前内侧骨关节炎患者的具体情况进行干预,以获得最佳效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/cfba26966afb/590_2024_3944_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/2975b4692b39/590_2024_3944_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/6c5e70d79d45/590_2024_3944_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/368cfc795dd4/590_2024_3944_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/cfba26966afb/590_2024_3944_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/2975b4692b39/590_2024_3944_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/6c5e70d79d45/590_2024_3944_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/368cfc795dd4/590_2024_3944_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39ff/11291513/cfba26966afb/590_2024_3944_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Age-stratified analysis of HTO and UKA clinical effects in cross-indicated anterior medial osteoarthritis.交叉指征性前内侧骨关节炎中 HTO 和 UKA 的临床效果的年龄分层分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jul;34(5):2421-2427. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03944-4. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
2
Therapeutic Effects Comparison and Revision Case Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Under 60 years: A 2-6-year Follow-up Study.60 岁以下内侧膝关节骨关节炎患者行单髁膝关节置换术与开放楔形胫骨高位截骨术的疗效对比及翻修病例分析:2-6 年随访研究。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(6):1635-1643. doi: 10.1111/os.12761. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
3
Comparison of HTO with articular cartilage surgery and UKA in unicompartmental OA.在单髁骨关节炎中,胫骨高位截骨术与关节软骨手术及单髁膝关节置换术的比较。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Jan;25(1):2309499016684092. doi: 10.1177/2309499016684092.
4
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单髁膝关节置换术优于胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧单间室骨关节炎:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29576. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029576.
5
Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis.老年患者的活动平台单髁膝关节置换术在短期临床结果方面优于中年患者的开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术,用于治疗进展期单纯内侧骨关节炎。
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2357-2363. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3880-4. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
6
Predictive factors for satisfaction after contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in isolated medial femorotibial osteoarthritis.孤立性内侧股胫关节炎行现代单髁膝关节置换术和胫骨高位截骨术后满意度的预测因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Feb;105(1):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
7
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2023 Jan-Apr;31(1):10225536231162829. doi: 10.1177/10225536231162829.
8
Return to Physical Activity After High Tibial Osteotomy or Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Pooling Data Analysis.胫骨高位截骨术或单髁膝关节置换术后恢复体力活动:系统评价和汇总数据分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;49(5):1372-1380. doi: 10.1177/0363546520948861. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
10
Management of medial femorotibial osteoarthritis: Epidemiology, and survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus valgus high tibial osteotomy in France. Study of 108,007 cases from the French National Hospitals Database.中文译文:法国膝关节单髁置换术与外侧胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧股胫关节骨关节炎的管理:一项基于法国国家医院数据库的 108007 例病例的研究。流行病学及生存率比较。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Dec;109(8):103692. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103692. Epub 2023 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Versus High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Osteoarthritis: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 56,000 Patients.单髁膝关节置换术与高位胫骨截骨术治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎的比较:对56000例患者的最新荟萃分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Sep;17(9):2499-2513. doi: 10.1111/os.70049. Epub 2025 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty vs. high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis (UNIKORN): a study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎(UNIKORN):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Apr 5;24(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07263-7.
2
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Has Lower Infection, Conversion, and Complication Rates Compared to High Tibial Osteotomy.单髁膝关节置换术感染率、翻修率和并发症发生率均低于高胫骨截骨术。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Dec;35(14):1518-1523. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757597. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
3
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower pain levels but inferior range of motion, compared with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.
单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术相比,疼痛程度较低,但活动范围较小:荟萃分析的系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Sep 24;17(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03319-7.
4
Comparison of Unilateral Knee Arthroplasty with High Tibial Osteotomy in Surgical Treatment of Medial Knee Osteoarthritis.单侧膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎的比较。
Arch Iran Med. 2022 May 1;25(5):324-328. doi: 10.34172/aim.2022.53.
5
High Tibial Osteotomy Versus Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术治疗单髁膝关节骨关节炎的系统评价和Meta分析
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Mar 21;56(6):973-982. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00620-9. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty after High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.翻修全膝关节置换术治疗高位胫骨截骨术和单髁膝关节置换术后的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1549-1557. doi: 10.1111/os.13311. Epub 2022 May 25.
7
Older age increases the risk of revision and perioperative complications after high tibial osteotomy for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis.高龄会增加单髁膝关节骨关节炎行胫骨高位截骨术后翻修和围手术期并发症的风险。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 21;11(1):24340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03259-y.
8
A comparison between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy for the surgical treatment of knee arthritis.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节炎的手术比较。
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):627-628. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.10.026. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
9
Comparison of joint awareness after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective multicenter study.内侧单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术后关节认知度的比较:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):1133-1140. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03994-x. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
10
Unicompartmental knee replacement and high tibial osteotomy for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis: A comparative study protocol.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧单髁膝关节骨关节炎:一项比较研究方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23454. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023454.