Millar Morgan M, Mayer Jeanmarie, Crook Jacob, Stratford Kristina M, Huber Tavis, Samore Matthew H
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Veterans Affairs, Salt Lake City Healthcare System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Apr 16;4(1):e47. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.44. eCollection 2024.
The objective of this study was to determine factors associated with testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 among healthcare personnel. Secondary objectives were to assess representativeness of recruited participants and the effectiveness of a multiple-contact protocol for recruiting healthcare personnel in this COVID-19 study.
Survey study, conducted as part of an observational test-negative study of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness.
University of Utah Health system, including both inpatient and outpatient facilities.
Clinical and non-clinical healthcare personnel at University of Utah Health. 1456 were contacted and 503 (34.5%) completed the survey. Cases were all eligible employees testing positive for COVID-19, with 3:1 randomly selected, matched controls (test negative) selected weekly.
Online survey.
Significant differences in the demographics of participants and the source population were observed; e.g., nursing staff comprised 31.6% of participants but only 23.3% of the source population. The multiple-contact recruitment protocol increased participation by ten percentage points and ensured equal representation of controls. Potential exposure to illness outside of work was strongly predictive of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 (OR = 3.74; 95% CI: 2.29, 6.11) whereas potential exposure at work was protective against testing positive (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.88).
Carefully designed recruitment protocols increase participation and representation of controls, but bias in participant demographics still exists. The negative association between potential workplace exposure and positive test suggests testing bias in the test-negative design. Healthcare personnel's potential exposures to COVID-19 outside of the workplace are important predictors of SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity.
本研究的目的是确定医护人员中新型冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测呈阳性的相关因素。次要目的是评估招募参与者的代表性以及在这项2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)研究中采用多次接触方案招募医护人员的有效性。
调查研究,作为COVID-19疫苗有效性观察性检测阴性研究的一部分。
犹他大学医疗系统,包括住院和门诊设施。
犹他大学医疗系统的临床和非临床医护人员。共联系了1456人,503人(34.5%)完成了调查。病例为所有COVID-19检测呈阳性的合格员工,每周随机选取3名匹配的对照(检测阴性),比例为3:1。
在线调查。
观察到参与者和源人群在人口统计学方面存在显著差异;例如,护理人员占参与者的31.6%,但仅占源人群的23.3%。多次接触招募方案使参与率提高了10个百分点,并确保了对照的均衡代表性。工作之外潜在的疾病暴露是SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性的强烈预测因素(比值比[OR]=3.74;95%置信区间[CI]:2.29,6.11),而工作中的潜在暴露则可预防检测呈阳性(OR:0.51,95%CI:0.29,0.88)。
精心设计的招募方案可提高参与率和对照的代表性,但参与者人口统计学方面的偏差仍然存在。潜在工作场所暴露与检测阳性之间的负相关表明检测阴性设计中存在检测偏差。医护人员在工作场所以外潜在接触COVID-19是SARS-CoV-2血清阳性的重要预测因素。