• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

介入放射学中中度镇静与监护麻醉护理的围手术期及手术间时间比较。

Comparison of periprocedural and procedure room times between moderate sedation and monitored anesthesia care in interventional radiology.

作者信息

Sotirchos Vlasios S, Alexander Erica S, Zhao Ken, Zhan Chenyang, Yarmohammadi Hooman, Ziv Etay, Erinjeri Joseph P

机构信息

Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Imaging Sci. 2024 Apr 11;14:11. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_9_2024. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.25259/JCIS_9_2024
PMID:38628610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11021082/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In recent years, there has been increased utilization of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in interventional radiology (IR) departments. The purpose of this study was to compare pre-procedure bed, procedure room, and post-procedure bed times for IR procedures performed with either nurse-administered moderate sedation (MOSED) or MAC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An institutional review board-approved single institution retrospective review of IR procedures between January 2010 and September 2022 was performed. Procedures performed with general anesthesia or local anesthetic only, missing time stamps, or where <50 cases were performed for both MAC and MOSED were excluded from the study. Pre-procedure bed, procedure room, post-procedure bed, and total IR encounter times were compared between MAC and MOSED using the -test. The effect size was estimated using Cohen's d statistic.

RESULTS

97,480 cases spanning 69 procedure codes were examined. Mean time in pre-procedure bed was 27 min longer for MAC procedures (69 vs. 42 min, < 0.001, d = 0.95). Mean procedure room time was 11 min shorter for MAC (60 vs. 71 min, < 0.001, d = 0.48), and mean time in post-procedure bed was 10 min longer for MAC (102 vs. 92 min, < 0.001, d = 0.22). Total IR encounter times were on average 27 min longer for MAC cases (231 vs. 204 min, < 0.001, d = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

MAC improves the utilization of IR procedure rooms, but at the cost of increased patient time in the pre- and post-procedure areas.

摘要

目的

近年来,介入放射科(IR)对监护麻醉(MAC)的使用有所增加。本研究的目的是比较采用护士实施的中度镇静(MOSED)或MAC进行IR手术时的术前病床、手术间和术后病床时间。

材料与方法

对2010年1月至2022年9月期间的IR手术进行了一项经机构审查委员会批准的单机构回顾性研究。排除了仅采用全身麻醉或局部麻醉、缺少时间戳记,或MAC和MOSED手术例数均少于50例的手术。使用t检验比较MAC和MOSED之间的术前病床、手术间、术后病床和IR总诊疗时间。使用Cohen's d统计量估计效应大小。

结果

共检查了涵盖69个手术代码的97480例病例。MAC手术的术前病床平均时间长27分钟(69分钟对42分钟,P<0.001,d=0.95)。MAC的手术间平均时间短11分钟(60分钟对71分钟,P<0.001,d=0.48),MAC的术后病床平均时间长10分钟(102分钟对92分钟,P<0.001,d=0.22)。MAC病例的IR总诊疗时间平均长27分钟(231分钟对204分钟,P<0.001,d=0.41)。

结论

MAC提高了IR手术室的利用率,但代价是患者在术前和术后区域的时间增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/59e54b23004a/JCIS-14-11-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/b80b4d9c1545/JCIS-14-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/61fd68485bdf/JCIS-14-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/d4d93f3d439f/JCIS-14-11-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/59e54b23004a/JCIS-14-11-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/b80b4d9c1545/JCIS-14-11-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/61fd68485bdf/JCIS-14-11-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/d4d93f3d439f/JCIS-14-11-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0bbc/11021082/59e54b23004a/JCIS-14-11-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of periprocedural and procedure room times between moderate sedation and monitored anesthesia care in interventional radiology.介入放射学中中度镇静与监护麻醉护理的围手术期及手术间时间比较。
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2024 Apr 11;14:11. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_9_2024. eCollection 2024.
2
Ideal sedation for stroke thrombectomy: a prospective pilot single-center observational study.理想的卒中取栓术镇静:一项前瞻性单中心观察性研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Feb 1;46(2):E16. doi: 10.3171/2018.11.FOCUS18522.
3
Interactions between midazolam and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care.监测麻醉护理期间咪达唑仑与瑞芬太尼之间的相互作用。
Anesthesiology. 1996 Dec;85(6):1283-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199612000-00009.
4
A randomized controlled trial evaluating general endotracheal anesthesia versus monitored anesthesia care and the incidence of sedation-related adverse events during ERCP in high-risk patients.一项评价全身气管内麻醉与监护麻醉护理,以及高危患者行 ERCP 时镇静相关不良事件发生率的随机对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Apr;89(4):855-862. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
5
Operational outcomes of propofol sedation versus fentanyl, midazolam and diphenhydramine sedation for endoscopies and colonoscopies at an academic medical center.在学术医疗中心,比较异丙酚镇静与芬太尼、咪达唑仑和苯海拉明镇静用于内镜和结肠镜检查的操作结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0294418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294418. eCollection 2023.
6
Monitored anesthesia care in and outside the operating room.手术室内外的监护麻醉管理
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Aug;69(4):319-26. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.4.319. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
7
Impact of Respiratory Compromise in Inpatient Interventional Radiology Procedures with Moderate Sedation in the United States.美国中度镇静下住院介入放射学程序中呼吸功能障碍的影响。
Radiology. 2019 Sep;292(3):702-710. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182455. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
8
Monitored Anesthesia Care for Subcutaneous Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation: A Single-Center Experience.皮下植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术的监测麻醉护理:单中心经验
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1228-33. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
Choice of sedation in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: is monitored anesthesia care as safe as general anesthesia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中镇静方式的选择:监护麻醉与全身麻醉一样安全吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov-Dec;34(6):879-887. doi: 10.20524/aog.2021.0650. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Defining the Time Benefit of Awake Versus General Anesthesia for Single-Level Lumbar Spine Surgery.定义单节段腰椎手术中清醒麻醉与全身麻醉的时间效益。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;158:e793-e798. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.058. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Anesthetic considerations for outpatient interventional radiology procedures for cancer patients.癌症患者门诊介入放射学手术的麻醉注意事项。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2025 Aug 1;38(4):383-390. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001515. Epub 2025 May 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient satisfaction with deep versus light/moderate sedation for non-surgical procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.患者对非手术治疗中深度与浅/中度镇静的满意度:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 10;100(36):e27176. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027176.
2
Sedation and analgesia in interventional radiology: Where do we stand, where are we heading and why does it matter?介入放射学中的镇静与镇痛:我们处于何处,我们的方向在哪里,以及为什么这很重要?
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019 Dec;100(12):753-762. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Impact of Moderate Sedation versus Monitored Anesthesia Care on Outcomes and Cost of Endobronchial Ultrasound Transbronchial Needle Aspiration.
中度镇静与监护麻醉对支气管内超声引导经支气管针吸活检术的结果及成本的影响
Pulm Med. 2019 May 9;2019:4347852. doi: 10.1155/2019/4347852. eCollection 2019.
4
The future of anesthesia for interventional radiology.介入放射学麻醉的未来。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;31(4):469-472. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000609.
5
A Systematic Review of Factors Associated With Utilization of Monitored Anesthesia Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.一项关于与胃肠内镜检查监护麻醉使用相关因素的系统评价
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016 Jun;12(6):361-70.
6
Common procedures and strategies for anaesthesia in interventional radiology.介入放射学中的常见麻醉程序和策略。
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Aug;28(4):458-63. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000208.
7
Moderate sedation: what radiologists need to know.中度镇静:放射科医生需要了解的知识。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov;201(5):941-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9501.