• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰基于 QR 码的 COVID-19 数字接触者追踪应用程序的人口和接触者追踪参与情况。

Population and contact tracer uptake of New Zealand's QR-code-based digital contact tracing app for COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Apr 17;152:e66. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824000608.

DOI:10.1017/S0950268824000608
PMID:38629265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11062780/
Abstract

This study aimed to understand the population and contact tracer uptake of the quick response (QR)-code-based function of the New Zealand COVID Tracer App (NZCTA) used for digital contact tracing (DCT). We used a retrospective cohort of all COVID-19 cases between August 2020 and February 2022. Cases of Asian and other ethnicities were 2.6 times (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 2.58, 99 per cent confidence interval (95% CI) 2.18, 3.05) and 1.8 times (aRR 1.81, 95% CI 1.58, 2.06) more likely than Māori cases to generate a token during the Delta period, and this persisted during the Omicron period. Contact tracing organization also influenced location token generation with cases handled by National Case Investigation Service (NCIS) staff being 2.03 (95% CI 1.79, 2.30) times more likely to generate a token than cases managed by clinical staff at local Public Health Units (PHUs). Public uptake and participation in the location-based system independent of contact tracer uptake were estimated at 45%. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the QR code system was estimated to be close to nil for detecting close contacts but close to 100% for detecting casual contacts. Our paper shows that the QR-code-based function of the NZCTA likely made a negligible impact on the COVID-19 response in New Zealand (NZ) in relation to isolating potential close contacts of cases but likely was effective at identifying and notifying casual contacts.

摘要

本研究旨在了解新西兰 COVID Tracer App(NZCTA)基于快速响应(QR)码的功能在数字接触者追踪(DCT)中的人群和接触者追踪器的使用情况。我们使用了 2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 2 月期间所有 COVID-19 病例的回顾性队列。亚洲和其他族裔的病例生成令牌的可能性是毛利族裔病例的 2.6 倍(调整后的相对风险(aRR)2.58,99%置信区间(95%CI)2.18,3.05)和 1.8 倍(aRR 1.81,95%CI 1.58,2.06),在德尔塔时期,这一情况持续到奥密克戎时期。接触者追踪组织也影响位置令牌的生成,国家病例调查服务(NCIS)工作人员处理的病例生成令牌的可能性是当地公共卫生单位(PHU)临床工作人员管理的病例的 2.03 倍(95%CI 1.79,2.30)。独立于接触者追踪器使用,公众对基于位置的系统的接受度和参与度估计为 45%。QR 码系统的阳性预测值(PPV)估计为接近零,用于检测密切接触者,但接近 100%,用于检测偶然接触者。我们的论文表明,与隔离病例的潜在密切接触者相比,新西兰 COVID Tracer App(NZCTA)基于 QR 码的功能对新西兰(NZ)的 COVID-19 应对可能产生了微不足道的影响,但可能有效地识别和通知偶然接触者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a580/11062780/35b24b3aed9b/S0950268824000608_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a580/11062780/6839cb763964/S0950268824000608_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a580/11062780/35b24b3aed9b/S0950268824000608_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a580/11062780/6839cb763964/S0950268824000608_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a580/11062780/35b24b3aed9b/S0950268824000608_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Population and contact tracer uptake of New Zealand's QR-code-based digital contact tracing app for COVID-19.新西兰基于 QR 码的 COVID-19 数字接触者追踪应用程序的人口和接触者追踪参与情况。
Epidemiol Infect. 2024 Apr 17;152:e66. doi: 10.1017/S0950268824000608.
2
An evaluation of the COVID-19 self-service digital contact tracing system in New Zealand.新西兰对 COVID-19 自助式数字接触者追踪系统的评估。
Health Policy. 2024 Jun;144:105073. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105073. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
3
Effectiveness evaluation of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 中的效果评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e250-e258. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00010-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
4
A Data-Driven Simulation of the Exposure Notification Cascade for Digital Contact Tracing of SARS-CoV-2 in Zurich, Switzerland.基于数据的瑞士苏黎世 SARS-CoV-2 数字接触者追踪中暴露通知级联的仿真。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218184. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8184.
5
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.
6
Individual-Level Evaluation of the Exposure Notification Cascade in the SwissCovid Digital Proximity Tracing App: Observational Study.瑞士新冠数字接触追踪应用程序中暴露通知级联的个体水平评估:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 19;8(5):e35653. doi: 10.2196/35653.
7
User Experiences of the NZ COVID Tracer App in New Zealand: Thematic Analysis of Interviews.新西兰新冠病毒追踪应用程序在新西兰的用户体验:访谈主题分析
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):e26318. doi: 10.2196/26318.
8
The Influence of Normative Perceptions on the Uptake of the COVID-19 TraceTogether Digital Contact Tracing System: Cross-sectional Study.规范性认知对 COVID-19 TraceTogether 数字接触者追踪系统采用的影响:横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Nov 12;7(11):e30462. doi: 10.2196/30462.
9
Adherence and Association of Digital Proximity Tracing App Notifications With Earlier Time to Quarantine: Results From the Zurich SARS-CoV-2 Cohort Study.数字接触者追踪应用通知的遵从性及其与更早隔离时间的关联:来自苏黎世 SARS-CoV-2 队列研究的结果。
Int J Public Health. 2021 Aug 16;66:1603992. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1603992. eCollection 2021.
10
'Barely keeping the wheels on the trolley': A qualitative study of the New Zealand COVID Tracer App.“勉强维持追踪器的运转”:新西兰 COVID Tracer App 的定性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;356:117147. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117147. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparing for the next pandemic: insights from Aotearoa New Zealand's Covid-19 response.为下一次大流行做准备:来自新西兰应对新冠疫情的见解。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2025 Mar 18;56:101525. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2025.101525. eCollection 2025 Mar.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic scoping review of the implementation, adoption, use, and effectiveness of digital contact tracing interventions for COVID-19 in the Western Pacific Region.西太平洋地区COVID-19数字接触者追踪干预措施的实施、采用、使用及效果的系统综述
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023 May;34:100647. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100647. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Epidemiological impacts of the NHS COVID-19 app in England and Wales throughout its first year.英格兰和威尔士全民保健制度 COVID-19 应用程序在其第一年的流行病学影响。
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 22;14(1):858. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36495-z.
3
The August 2020 COVID-19 outbreak in Aotearoa, New Zealand: Delayed contact tracing for Pacific people contributes to widening health disparities.
2020年8月新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的新冠疫情:太平洋岛民接触者追踪工作的延迟导致健康差距不断扩大。
IJID Reg. 2023 Mar;6:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
4
COVID-19 and other pandemics require a coherent response strategy.新冠疫情及其他大流行病需要一个协调一致的应对策略。
Lancet. 2023 Jan 28;401(10373):265-266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02489-8. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Defining Key Performance Indicators for the California COVID-19 Exposure Notification System (CA Notify).定义加利福尼亚州 COVID-19 接触通知系统(CA Notify)的关键绩效指标。
Public Health Rep. 2022 Nov-Dec;137(2_suppl):67S-75S. doi: 10.1177/00333549221129354. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
6
Performance of the Swiss Digital Contact-Tracing App Over Various SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Waves: Repeated Cross-sectional Analyses.瑞士数字化接触者追踪应用在不同 SARS-CoV-2 大流行波次中的表现:重复横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e41004. doi: 10.2196/41004.
7
Expert insights on digital contact tracing: interviews with contact tracing policy professionals in New Zealand.数字接触者追踪专家观点:对新西兰接触者追踪政策专业人员的访谈。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Jun 1;37(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac059.
8
Individual-Level Evaluation of the Exposure Notification Cascade in the SwissCovid Digital Proximity Tracing App: Observational Study.瑞士新冠数字接触追踪应用程序中暴露通知级联的个体水平评估:观察性研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 19;8(5):e35653. doi: 10.2196/35653.
9
Effectiveness of COVID-19 digital proximity tracing app in Finland.新冠病毒数字近距离追踪应用程序在芬兰的有效性。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 Jun;28(6):903-904. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
10
Factors impacting the use of the NZ COVID Tracer application in New Zealand".影响新西兰新冠病毒追踪应用程序在新西兰使用的因素
Smart Health (Amst). 2022 Jun;24:100278. doi: 10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100278. Epub 2022 Feb 25.