Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6891-8609.
J Vis. 2024 Apr 1;24(4):16. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.4.16.
Saccadic choice tasks use eye movements as a response method, typically in a task where observers are asked to saccade as quickly as possible to an image of a prespecified target category. Using this approach, face-selective saccades have been observed within 100 ms poststimulus. When taking into account oculomotor processing, this suggests that faces can be detected in as little as 70 to 80 ms. It has therefore been suggested that face detection must occur during the initial feedforward sweep, since this latency leaves little time for feedback processing. In the current experiment, we tested this hypothesis using backward masking-a technique shown to primarily disrupt feedback processing while leaving feedforward activation relatively intact. Based on minimum saccadic reaction time, we found that face detection benefited from ultra-fast, accurate saccades within 110 to 160 ms and that these eye movements are obtainable even under extreme masking conditions that limit perceptual awareness. However, masking did significantly increase the median SRT for faces. In the manual responses, we found remarkable detection accuracy for faces and houses, even when participants indicated having no visual experience of the test images. These results provide evidence for the view that the saccadic bias to faces is initiated by coarse information used to categorize faces in the feedforward sweep but that, in most cases, additional processing is required to quickly reach the threshold for saccade initiation.
扫视选择任务使用眼动作为反应方法,通常在观察者被要求尽快扫视到预定目标类别的图像的任务中使用。使用这种方法,在刺激后 100 毫秒内观察到了选择性扫视的面孔。考虑到眼动处理,这表明面孔可以在 70 到 80 毫秒内被检测到。因此,有人认为面孔检测必须在初始前馈扫描期间进行,因为这个潜伏期几乎没有时间进行反馈处理。在当前的实验中,我们使用反向掩蔽——一种主要破坏反馈处理而使前馈激活相对完整的技术来检验这一假设。基于最小的扫视反应时间,我们发现,即使在限制知觉意识的极端掩蔽条件下,面孔检测也受益于 110 到 160 毫秒内的超快速、准确的扫视,并且这些眼动甚至是在极端掩蔽条件下也可以获得的。然而,掩蔽确实显著增加了面孔的中位 SRT。在手动反应中,我们发现即使参与者表示对测试图像没有视觉体验,面孔和房屋的检测准确性也非常高。这些结果为这样一种观点提供了证据,即扫视对面孔的偏向是由用于在前馈扫描中分类面孔的粗略信息引发的,但在大多数情况下,需要额外的处理才能快速达到扫视起始的阈值。