• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于核黄素的设置作为一种初步筛选口罩过滤效率的替代方法。

Riboflavin based setup as an alternative method for a preliminary screening of face mask filtration efficiency.

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59485-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-59485-7
PMID:38632265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11024099/
Abstract

Face masks are essential in reducing the transmission of respiratory infections and bacterial filtration efficiency, a key parameter of mask performances, requires the use of Staphylococcus aureus and specialised staff. This study aims to develop a novel method for a preliminary screening of masks or materials filtration efficiency by a green, easy and rapid setup based on the use of a riboflavin solution, a safe autofluorescent biomolecule. The proposed setup is composed of a commercial aerosol generator commonly used for aerosol therapy, custom 3D printed aerosol chamber and sample holder, a filter for downstream riboflavin detection and a vacuum pump. The filtration efficiency of four different masks was assessed using the riboflavin-based setup and the bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE). The averaged filtration efficiency values, measured with both methods, were similar but were higher for the riboflavin-based setup (about 2% for all tested samples) than bacterial filtration efficiency. Considering the good correlation, the riboflavin-based setup can be considered validated as an alternative method to bacterial filtration efficiency for masks and related materials fabrics filtration efficiency screening but This study aims to develop a novel method for a preliminary screening of masks or materials filtration efficiency by a green, easy and rapid setup based on the use of a riboflavin solution, a safe autofluorescent biomolecule, but not to replace regulation approaches. The proposed setup can be easily implemented at low price, is more rapid and eco-friendly and can be performed in chemical-physical laboratories without the needing of biosafety laboratory and specialised operators.

摘要

口罩在降低呼吸道感染传播方面至关重要,细菌过滤效率是口罩性能的一个关键参数,这需要使用金黄色葡萄球菌和专业人员。本研究旨在开发一种新的方法,通过使用核黄素溶液(一种安全的自发荧光生物分子)建立一个绿色、简单和快速的初步筛选口罩或材料过滤效率的方法。该方法使用一个商业化的气溶胶发生器,定制的 3D 打印气溶胶室和样品架,一个用于下游核黄素检测的过滤器和一个真空泵。使用核黄素基装置和细菌过滤效率(BFE)评估了四种不同口罩的过滤效率。两种方法测量的平均过滤效率值相似,但核黄素基装置的过滤效率值更高(所有测试样品均约为 2%)。考虑到良好的相关性,可以认为核黄素基装置可作为细菌过滤效率的替代方法,用于口罩和相关材料的过滤效率筛选,但本研究旨在开发一种新的方法,通过使用核黄素溶液(一种安全的自发荧光生物分子)建立一个绿色、简单和快速的初步筛选口罩或材料过滤效率的方法,而不是取代监管方法。该装置可以以较低的价格轻松实现,更快速、环保,并且可以在化学物理实验室中进行,而无需生物安全实验室和专业操作人员。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/4dc5a808e770/41598_2024_59485_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/89f2f1cc4bd6/41598_2024_59485_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/fa6708f4d824/41598_2024_59485_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/c602b66e7525/41598_2024_59485_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/f7b10c2db885/41598_2024_59485_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/b93aa15e6420/41598_2024_59485_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/4dc5a808e770/41598_2024_59485_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/89f2f1cc4bd6/41598_2024_59485_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/fa6708f4d824/41598_2024_59485_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/c602b66e7525/41598_2024_59485_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/f7b10c2db885/41598_2024_59485_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/b93aa15e6420/41598_2024_59485_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6534/11024099/4dc5a808e770/41598_2024_59485_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Riboflavin based setup as an alternative method for a preliminary screening of face mask filtration efficiency.基于核黄素的设置作为一种初步筛选口罩过滤效率的替代方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59485-7.
2
Evaluating the filtration efficiency of commercial facemasks' materials against respiratory aerosol droplets.评估商业口罩材料对呼吸气溶胶飞沫的过滤效率。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2022 Jan;72(1):3-9. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2021.1948459. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
3
Staphylococcus epidermidis is a safer surrogate of Staphylococcus aureus in testing bacterial filtration efficiency of face masks.表皮葡萄球菌是测试口罩细菌过滤效率时替代金黄色葡萄球菌的更安全选择。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 9;13(1):21807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49005-4.
4
Evaluation of masks and mask material suitability for bioaerosol capture.评估口罩和口罩材料对生物气溶胶捕获的适用性。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2024 Oct;21(10):709-720. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2024.2394613. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
5
Face mask performance related to potentially infectious aerosol particles, breathing mode and facial leakage.口罩对潜在传染性气溶胶颗粒、呼吸模式和面部泄漏的防护性能。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 Mar;248:114103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2022.114103. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
Testing of Commercial Masks and Respirators and Cotton Mask Insert Materials using SARS-CoV-2 Virion-Sized Particulates: Comparison of Ideal Aerosol Filtration Efficiency versus Fitted Filtration Efficiency.利用 SARS-CoV-2 病毒大小的颗粒对商用口罩和呼吸器及棉口罩插入材料进行测试:理想气溶胶过滤效率与拟合过滤效率的比较。
Nano Lett. 2020 Oct 14;20(10):7642-7647. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c03182. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
Aerosol Filtration Efficiency of Common Fabrics Used in Respiratory Cloth Masks.常见医用口罩滤布材料的气溶胶过滤效率。
ACS Nano. 2020 May 26;14(5):6339-6347. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c03252. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
A Review of Filtration Performance of Protective Masks.防护口罩过滤性能评价研究综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 28;20(3):2346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032346.
9
Comparison of the Filter Efficiency of Medical Nonwoven Fabrics against Three Different Microbe Aerosols.医用无纺布对三种不同微生物气溶胶的过滤效率比较。
Biocontrol Sci. 2018;23(2):61-69. doi: 10.4265/bio.23.61.
10
Bacterial filtration efficiency of medical face masks - Evaluation of the use of disposable plastic petri dishes in Andersen impactor.医用口罩的细菌过滤效率——在安德森撞击器中使用一次性塑料培养皿的评估
J Microbiol Methods. 2023 Jan;204:106655. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2022.106655. Epub 2022 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
One-step silver coating of polypropylene surgical mask with antibacterial and antiviral properties.具有抗菌和抗病毒特性的聚丙烯外科口罩的一步式镀银
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 3;10(1):e23196. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23196. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
2
Staphylococcus epidermidis is a safer surrogate of Staphylococcus aureus in testing bacterial filtration efficiency of face masks.表皮葡萄球菌是测试口罩细菌过滤效率时替代金黄色葡萄球菌的更安全选择。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 9;13(1):21807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49005-4.
3
Filtration efficiency of medical and community face masks using viral and bacterial bioaerosols.
医用和普通口罩对病毒及细菌气溶胶的过滤效率。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 2;13(1):7115. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34283-9.
4
Patient safety implications of wearing a face mask for prevention in the era of COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and consensus recommendations.佩戴口罩预防 COVID-19 大流行时代的患者安全问题:系统评价和共识建议。
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):275-296. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03083-w. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
5
Electrospun nanofibrous membrane with antibacterial and antiviral properties decorated with Myoporum bontioides extract and silver-doped carbon nitride nanoparticles for medical masks application.负载波路草提取物和银掺杂氮化碳纳米颗粒的具有抗菌和抗病毒特性的电纺纳米纤维膜用于医用口罩应用。
Sep Purif Technol. 2022 Oct 1;298:121565. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121565. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
6
A Simple Method to Quantify Outward Leakage of Medical Face Masks and Barrier Face Coverings: Implication for the Overall Filtration Efficiency.一种量化医用口罩和防护面罩向外泄漏的简单方法:对整体过滤效率的影响
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063548.
7
Comparison of bacterial filtration efficiency vs. particle filtration efficiency to assess the performance of non-medical face masks.比较细菌过滤效率与颗粒过滤效率,以评估非医用口罩的性能。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):1188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05245-4.
8
Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.支持新冠病毒空气传播的十个科学依据。
Lancet. 2021 May 1;397(10285):1603-1605. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00869-2. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
9
Review of the Breathability and Filtration Efficiency of Common Household Materials for Face Masks.常见家用口罩材料的透气性和过滤效率综述。
ACS Nano. 2021 Apr 27;15(4):5904-5924. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c10146. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
10
New insights into the standard method of assessing bacterial filtration efficiency of medical face masks.对医用口罩细菌过滤效率标准评估方法的新见解。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 15;11(1):5887. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85327-x.