• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using narratives to correct politically charged health misinformation and address affective belief echoes.利用叙事来纠正带有政治色彩的健康错误信息,并解决情感共鸣的信仰问题。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Aug 25;46(3):430-436. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae050.
2
The Potential for Narrative Correctives to Combat Misinformation.叙事纠正措施对抗错误信息的潜力。
J Commun. 2019 Jun;69(3):298-319. doi: 10.1093/joc/jqz014. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
3
Misinformation about COVID-19: evidence for differential latent profiles and a strong association with trust in science.关于 COVID-19 的错误信息:不同潜在特征的证据,以及与对科学的信任之间的强关联。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10103-x.
4
Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.调查和提高美国公民对新冠疫情的认知准确性:纵向调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 12;23(1):e24069. doi: 10.2196/24069.
5
Narrative elaboration makes misinformation and corrective information regarding COVID-19 more believable.叙述性阐述使有关 COVID-19 的错误信息和纠正信息更具可信度。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jun 28;15(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06134-9.
6
Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the U.S.阴谋论是美国控制 COVID-19 传播的障碍
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Oct;263:113356. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
Association of COVID-19 Misinformation with Face Mask Wearing and Social Distancing in a Nationally Representative US Sample.在一项具有全国代表性的美国样本中,与新冠病毒错误信息相关的口罩佩戴和社交距离行为。
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):6-14. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847437. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
8
Comparing the effects of simple and refutational narratives in misinformation correction: The moderating roles of correction placement and issue involvement.比较简单和反驳性叙述在错误信息纠正中的效果:纠正位置和问题卷入的调节作用。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Nov;32(8):985-1002. doi: 10.1177/09636625231168995. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Interventions to Correct Misinformation About Tobacco Products.纠正关于烟草制品错误信息的干预措施。
Tob Regul Sci. 2015 Jul;1(2):186-197. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.2.8. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
10
The Role of Influence of Presumed Influence and Anticipated Guilt in Evoking Social Correction of COVID-19 Misinformation.诱发对新冠错误信息进行社会纠正的影响推测和预期内疚的作用。
Health Commun. 2022 Oct;37(11):1368-1377. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1888452. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Overcoming doubt: developing CDoH Essentials, a practical tool to introduce the commercial determinants of health.克服疑虑:开发 CDoH 基础知识,这是一个引入健康的商业决定因素的实用工具。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae166.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Public Cooperation with Face Covering at the Early Phases of COVID-19: Building Public Trust, Confidence, Knowledge Through Governmental Two-Way Symmetrical Communication.预测 COVID-19 早期公众对面部遮挡物的合作意愿:通过政府双向对称沟通建立公众信任、信心和知识。
Health Commun. 2024 Nov;39(12):2983-2996. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2297496. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
Effective correction of misinformation.有效纠正错误信息。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Dec;54:101712. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101712. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
3
Sociopolitical and psychological correlates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the United States during summer 2021.2021 年夏季美国民众对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫不决的社会政治和心理相关因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Aug;306:115112. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115112. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
4
Exploring the Sequencing Effects of Fear-Hope Appeals on Promoting MMR Vaccination.探索恐惧-希望诉求对促进 MMR 疫苗接种的测序效果。
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(10):2132-2140. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2054229. Epub 2022 Mar 27.
5
'Us-Versus-Them': Othering in COVID-19 public health behavior compliance.“我们与他们”:新冠疫情公共卫生行为合规中的他者化。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 24;17(1):e0261726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261726. eCollection 2022.
6
Viral mitigation and the COVID-19 pandemic: factors associated with adherence to social distancing protocols and hygienic behaviour.病毒缓解与新冠疫情:与遵守社交距离协议和卫生行为相关的因素
Psychol Health. 2023 Mar;38(3):283-306. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1960987. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
7
Who Trusts the WHO? Heuristics and Americans' Trust in the World Health Organization During the COVID-19 Pandemic.谁信任世界卫生组织?新冠疫情期间美国人信任世界卫生组织的启发法。
Soc Sci Q. 2021 Sep;102(5):2312-2330. doi: 10.1111/ssqu.12977. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
8
What factors underlie attitudes regarding protective mask use during the COVID-19 pandemic?在新冠疫情期间,人们对于佩戴防护口罩的态度背后有哪些因素?
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Oct;181:111038. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111038. Epub 2021 May 29.
9
Faster than warp speed: early attention to COVD-19 by anti-vaccine groups on Facebook.比曲速还快:反疫苗组织在 Facebook 上对 COVID-19 的早期关注。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Mar 7;44(1):e96-e105. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab093.
10
You don't have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections.你不必讲故事!一份注册报告测试叙事与非叙事错误信息纠正有效性的研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Dec 9;5(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00266-x.

利用叙事来纠正带有政治色彩的健康错误信息,并解决情感共鸣的信仰问题。

Using narratives to correct politically charged health misinformation and address affective belief echoes.

机构信息

Department of Communication Studies, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.

Department of Communication Studies, University of Georgia, Athens 30602, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Aug 25;46(3):430-436. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae050.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdae050
PMID:38632889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11358629/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In May 2020, news outlets reported misinformation about the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) related to COVID-19. Correcting misinformation about outbreaks and politics is particularly challenging. Affective belief echoes continue to influence audiences even after successful correction. Narrative and emotional flow scholarship suggest that a narrative corrective with a positive ending could reduce belief echoes. Therefore, this study investigated the efficacy of a narrative corrective with a relief ending for correcting misinformation about the CDC.

METHODS

Between 29 May and 4 June 2020, we tested the effectiveness of a narrative to correct this misinformation. Participants in the United States (N = 469) were enrolled via Qualtrics panels in an online message experiment and randomized to receive a narrative corrective, a didactic corrective or no corrective.

RESULTS

The narrative corrective resulted in lower endorsement of the misinformation compared with the control and the didactic corrective. The narrative corrective had a positive indirect effect on perceived CDC competence and mask wearing intentions for politically moderate and conservative participants via relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Public health institutions, such as the CDC, should consider utilizing narrative messaging with positive emotion endings to correct misinformation. Narratives better address affective belief echoes, particularly for counter-attitudinal audiences.

摘要

背景

2020 年 5 月,新闻媒体报道了与疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)有关的 COVID-19 错误信息。纠正有关疫情和政治的错误信息尤其具有挑战性。即使成功纠正后,情感共鸣仍会继续影响受众。叙事和情感流动研究表明,带有积极结局的叙事纠正可能会减少信念共鸣。因此,本研究调查了带有缓解结局的叙事纠正对纠正有关疾病预防控制中心的错误信息的效果。

方法

在 2020 年 5 月 29 日至 6 月 4 日期间,我们测试了一个叙事来纠正这种错误信息的有效性。通过 Qualtrics 面板在美国招募的参与者(N=469)参与了在线信息实验,并随机分配接受叙事纠正、说教式纠正或无纠正。

结果

与对照组和说教式纠正相比,叙事纠正导致对错误信息的认可程度降低。叙事纠正对政治温和和保守的参与者的感知 CDC 能力和戴口罩意愿产生了积极的间接影响,其通过缓解发挥作用。

结论

疾病预防控制中心等公共卫生机构应考虑利用带有积极情感结局的叙事信息来纠正错误信息。叙事可以更好地解决情感共鸣问题,特别是对于与自己观点相左的受众。