Cappella Joseph N, Maloney Erin, Ophir Yotam, Brennan Emily
Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.
Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Tob Regul Sci. 2015 Jul;1(2):186-197. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.2.8. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
In 2006, the U.S. District Court held that tobacco companies had "falsely and fraudulently" denied: tobacco causes lung cancer; environmental smoke endangers children's respiratory systems; nicotine is highly addictive; low tar cigarettes were less harmful when they were not; they marketed to children; they manipulated nicotine delivery to enhance addiction; and they concealed and destroyed evidence to prevent accurate public knowledge. The courts required the tobacco companies to repair this misinformation. Several studies evaluated types of corrective statements (CS). We argue that most CS proposed ("simple CS's") will fall prey to "belief echoes" leaving affective remnants of the misinformation untouched while correcting underlying knowledge. Alternative forms for CS ("enhanced CS's") are proposed that include narrative forms, causal linkage, and emotional links to the receiver.
2006年,美国地方法院裁定,烟草公司“虚假且欺诈性地”否认了以下几点:烟草会导致肺癌;环境烟雾会危害儿童呼吸系统;尼古丁极易上瘾;低焦油香烟并不比普通香烟危害小;他们向儿童进行营销;他们操控尼古丁释放以增强成瘾性;以及他们隐瞒和销毁证据以阻止公众获得准确信息。法院要求烟草公司纠正这些错误信息。多项研究评估了纠正声明(CS)的类型。我们认为,大多数提议的纠正声明(“简单纠正声明”)将沦为“信念回声”的牺牲品,在纠正基础知识的同时,却未触及错误信息的情感残余。我们提出了纠正声明的替代形式(“强化纠正声明”),包括叙述形式、因果联系以及与受众的情感联系。