Kästner Anne, Petzke Frank
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Clinic, University Hospital, Georg-August-University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 3;5:1288758. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1288758. eCollection 2024.
In the endeavor to advance our understanding of interindividual differences in dealing with chronic pain, numerous motivational theories have been invoked in the past decade. As they focus on relevant, yet different aspects of the dynamic, multilevel processes involved in human voluntary action control, research findings seem fragmented and inconsistent. Here we present Personality Systems Interactions theory as an integrative meta-framework elucidating how different motivational and volitional processes work in concert under varying contextual conditions. PSI theory explains experience and behavior by the relative activation of four cognitive systems that take over different psychological functions during goal pursuit. In this way, it may complement existing content-related explanations of clinical phenomena by introducing a functional, third-person perspective on flexible goal management, pain acceptance and goal maintenance despite pain. In line with emerging evidence on the central role of emotion regulation in chronic pain, PSI theory delineates how the self-regulation of positive and negative affect impacts whether behavior is determined by rigid stimulus-response associations (i.e., habits) or by more abstract motives and values which afford more behavioral flexibility. Along with testable hypotheses, multimodal interventions expected to address intuitive emotion regulation as a central process mediating successful adaptation to chronic pain are discussed.
在努力增进我们对个体在应对慢性疼痛方面差异的理解过程中,过去十年间援引了众多动机理论。由于这些理论关注人类自愿行动控制中动态、多层次过程的相关但不同方面,研究结果似乎零散且不一致。在此,我们提出人格系统交互作用理论,作为一个综合的元框架,用以阐明不同的动机和意志过程在不同情境条件下如何协同工作。人格系统交互作用理论通过四个认知系统的相对激活来解释体验和行为,这四个认知系统在目标追求过程中承担不同的心理功能。通过这种方式,它可以通过引入一个关于灵活目标管理、疼痛接纳以及尽管疼痛仍维持目标的功能性、第三人称视角,来补充现有的与临床现象内容相关的解释。与关于情绪调节在慢性疼痛中核心作用的新证据一致,人格系统交互作用理论描绘了积极和消极情绪的自我调节如何影响行为是由僵化的刺激 - 反应关联(即习惯)决定,还是由更抽象的动机和价值观决定,而后者能提供更多行为灵活性。文中还讨论了可检验的假设以及预期能将直观情绪调节作为成功适应慢性疼痛的核心过程加以应对的多模式干预措施。