Suppr超能文献

细针穿刺细胞学检查在甲状腺肿瘤诊断中的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of tumors of the thyroid gland.

作者信息

Akerman M, Tennvall J, Biörklund A, Mårtensson H, Möller T

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 1985 Sep-Oct;29(5):850-5.

PMID:3863433
Abstract

A study of the preoperative fine needle aspiration cytologies in consecutive patients with primary malignant tumors (203 cases) or benign thyroid tumors (217 cases) showed a sensitivity of 0.57 and a specificity of 0.98. The sensitivity of FNA cytology in medullary and undifferentiated carcinomas was 0.82 and 0.84, respectively; none of these were microscopically misdiagnosed. The sensitivity was only 0.58 for papillary carcinomas (excluding occult carcinoma) and 0.42 for follicular carcinoma. Four reasons for these low sensitivities were identified: tumors missed at aspiration, microscopic misinterpretations, diagnoses of cellular atypia and indeterminate diagnoses. Reevaluation of the false diagnoses once more emphasized the problem of distinguishing follicular adenomas from follicular carcinomas. Microscopically undiagnosed papillary carcinomas were either the result of misinterpretations of the characteristic cytomorphologic features or of the smears being misdiagnosed as showing cellular atypia when papillary formations were missing and only one or two of the other cellular criteria were evident. The specificity of FNA cytology of thyroid tumors was found to be high enough to permit surgical intervention after a cytodiagnosis of malignancy.

摘要

一项针对连续的原发性恶性肿瘤患者(203例)或甲状腺良性肿瘤患者(217例)术前细针穿刺细胞学检查的研究显示,其敏感性为0.57,特异性为0.98。FNA细胞学检查对髓样癌和未分化癌的敏感性分别为0.82和0.84;这些病例在显微镜下均未误诊。对于乳头状癌(不包括隐匿性癌),敏感性仅为0.58,对于滤泡癌为0.42。确定了导致这些低敏感性的四个原因:穿刺时遗漏肿瘤、显微镜下误判、细胞异型性诊断以及不确定诊断。对假诊断的重新评估再次强调了区分滤泡性腺瘤和滤泡癌的问题。显微镜下未诊断出的乳头状癌要么是对特征性细胞形态学特征误判的结果,要么是在缺乏乳头状结构且仅一两个其他细胞标准明显时,涂片被误诊为显示细胞异型性。甲状腺肿瘤FNA细胞学检查的特异性足够高,足以在细胞诊断为恶性后进行手术干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验