Sasaki Tomoaki, Kuno Hirofumi, Nomura Keiichi, Muramatsu Yoshihisa, Aokage Keiju, Samejima Joji, Taki Tetsuro, Goto Eisuke, Wakabayashi Masashi, Furuya Hideki, Taguchi Hiroki, Kobayashi Tatsushi
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Department of Medical Information, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.
Jpn J Radiol. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s11604-025-01759-9.
This is a preliminary analysis of one of the secondary endpoints in the prospective study cohort. The aim of this study is to assess the image quality and diagnostic confidence for lung cancer of CT images generated by using cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT)-based photon-counting-detector-CT (PCD-CT) and comparing these super-high-resolution (SHR) images with conventional normal-resolution (NR) CT images.
Twenty-five patients (median age 75 years, interquartile range 66-78 years, 18 men and 7 women) with 29 lung nodules overall (including two patients with 4 and 2 nodules, respectively) were enrolled to undergo PCD-CT. Three types of images were reconstructed: a 512 × 512 matrix with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) as the NR image, a 1024 × 1024 matrix with AIDR 3D as the SHR image, and a 1024 × 1024 matrix with deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) as the SHR image. For qualitative analysis, two radiologists evaluated the matched reconstructed series twice (NR vs. SHR and SHR vs. SHR) and scored the presence of imaging findings, such as spiculation, lobulation, appearance of ground-glass opacity or air bronchiologram, image quality, and diagnostic confidence, using a 5-point Likert scale. For quantitative analysis, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the three images were compared.
In the qualitative analysis, compared to NR, SHR yielded higher image quality and diagnostic confidence, except for image noise (all P < 0.01). In comparison with SHR, SHR yielded higher image quality and diagnostic confidence (all P < 0.01). In the quantitative analysis, CNRs in the modified NR and SHR groups were higher than those in the SHR group (P = 0.003, <0.001, respectively).
In PCD-CT, SHR images provided the highest image quality and diagnostic confidence for lung tumor evaluation, followed by SHR and NR images. DLR demonstrated superior noise reduction compared to other reconstruction methods.
这是对前瞻性研究队列中一个次要终点的初步分析。本研究的目的是评估使用基于碲化镉锌(CZT)的光子计数探测器CT(PCD-CT)生成的CT图像对肺癌的图像质量和诊断置信度,并将这些超高分辨率(SHR)图像与传统的正常分辨率(NR)CT图像进行比较。
纳入25例患者(中位年龄75岁,四分位间距66 - 78岁,男性18例,女性7例),共29个肺结节(其中2例患者分别有4个和2个结节),接受PCD-CT检查。重建了三种类型的图像:以自适应迭代剂量降低3D(AIDR 3D)重建的512×512矩阵作为NR图像,以AIDR 3D重建的1024×1024矩阵作为SHR图像,以及以深度学习重建(DLR)重建的1024×1024矩阵作为SHR图像。对于定性分析,两名放射科医生对匹配的重建序列进行了两次评估(NR与SHR以及SHR与SHR),并使用5点李克特量表对毛刺、分叶、磨玻璃影或空气支气管造影的出现、图像质量和诊断置信度等影像学表现进行评分。对于定量分析,比较了三种图像的对比噪声比(CNR)。
在定性分析中,与NR相比,SHR产生了更高的图像质量和诊断置信度,但图像噪声除外(所有P < 0.01)。与SHR相比,SHR产生了更高的图像质量和诊断置信度(所有P < 0.01)。在定量分析中,改良NR组和SHR组的CNR高于SHR组(分别为P = 0.003,<0.001)。
在PCD-CT中,SHR图像为肺肿瘤评估提供了最高的图像质量和诊断置信度,其次是SHR和NR图像。与其他重建方法相比,DLR显示出卓越的降噪效果。