Academy of Public Health Services, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute-CAPHRI, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0292192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292192. eCollection 2024.
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of local evidence ecosystems in which academia and practice in the Public Health Service (PHS) are interconnected. However, appropriate organizational structures and well-trained staff are lacking and evidence use in local public health decision-making has to be integrated into training programs in Germany. To address this issue, we developed a framework incorporating a toolbox to conceptualize training programs designed to qualify public health professionals for working at the interface between academia and practice. We conducted a scoping review of training programs, key-informant interviews with public health experts, and a multi-professional stakeholder workshop and triangulated their output. The resulting toolbox consists of four core elements, encompassing 15 parameters: (1) content-related aspects, (2) context-related aspects, (3) aspects relevant for determining the training format, and (4) aspects relevant for consolidation and further development. Guiding questions with examples supports the application of the toolbox. Additionally, we introduced a how-to-use guidance to streamline the creation of new training programs, fostering knowledge transfer at the academia-practice interface, equipping public health researchers and practitioners with relevant skills for needs-based PHS research. By promoting collaborative training development across institutions, our approach encourages cross-institutional cooperation, enhances evidence utilization, and enables efficient resource allocation. This collaborative effort in developing training programs within local evidence ecosystems not only strengthens the scientific and practical impact but also lays a foundation for implementing complex public health measures effectively at the local level.
新冠疫情凸显了本地证据生态系统的重要性,该系统将学术界和公共卫生服务(PHS)中的实践联系起来。然而,目前缺乏适当的组织结构和训练有素的员工,并且必须将证据在地方公共卫生决策中的使用纳入德国的培训计划中。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一个框架,其中包括一个工具箱,用于构想培训计划,以培养公共卫生专业人员在学术界和实践之间的工作接口的能力。我们对培训计划进行了范围界定审查,对公共卫生专家进行了关键知情者访谈,并进行了多专业利益相关者研讨会,并对其结果进行了三角分析。由此产生的工具箱包括四个核心要素,涵盖 15 个参数:(1)与内容相关的方面,(2)与背景相关的方面,(3)与确定培训形式相关的方面,以及(4)与巩固和进一步发展相关的方面。带有示例的指导问题支持工具箱的应用。此外,我们引入了使用指南,以简化新培训计划的创建,促进学术界与实践之间的知识转移,为公共卫生研究人员和从业人员提供基于需求的 PHS 研究的相关技能。通过促进机构间的协作培训发展,我们的方法鼓励机构间的合作,提高证据利用率,并实现资源的有效分配。这种在本地证据生态系统中开发培训计划的协作努力不仅增强了科学和实践的影响力,而且为在地方一级有效实施复杂的公共卫生措施奠定了基础。