Keating P J
Br J Orthod. 1985 Oct;12(4):193-201. doi: 10.1179/bjo.12.4.193.
The skeletal morphology of bimaxillary dental protrusion has been investigated in a comparative cephalometric study. Because this is considered a subset of Class I malocclusions, the null hypothesis is that there should be no significant skeletal differences between this group and a Class I control group. There were 30 Caucasians in each group with no bias for age and sex differences between them. Eighteen radiographic landmarks were identified from which 33 skeletal, dental and soft tissue parameters were computed. The bimaxillary group had an average interincisal angle of 115 degrees versus the controls 135 degrees, and showed the following morphological features which persisted over a 5-year growth period: A shorter posterior cranial base. A longer and more prognathic maxilla. Similar mandibular dimensions and prognathism. A mild Class II skeletal pattern. A smaller upper and posterior face height. Diverging facial planes. A procumbent soft tissue profile with a low lip line. These findings indicate that there is a distinctive difference between the underlying skeletal patterns found in the two groups.
一项比较性头影测量研究对双颌牙前突的骨骼形态进行了调查。由于这被认为是I类错牙合的一个子集,零假设是该组与I类对照组之间不应存在显著的骨骼差异。每组有30名白种人,两组之间在年龄和性别上无偏差。确定了18个放射学标志点,并据此计算出33个骨骼、牙齿和软组织参数。双颌组的平均切牙间角为115度,而对照组为135度,并且呈现出以下在5年生长期间持续存在的形态特征:较短的后颅底。更长且更前突的上颌骨。相似的下颌尺寸和前突度。轻度的II类骨骼型。较小的上面部和后部面高。发散的面部平面。具有低唇线的前突软组织侧貌。这些发现表明两组中所发现的潜在骨骼型存在明显差异。