Buti Sebastiano, Olivari Alessandro, Masini Cristina, Bimbatti Davide, Sartori Donata, Ermacora Paola, Cattrini Carlo, Vitale Maria Giuseppa, Rossi Ernesto, Mucciarini Claudia, Rizzo Mimma, Sisani Michele, Santoni Matteo, Roviello Giandomenico, Mollica Veronica, Conteduca Vincenza, Grillone Francesco, Cinausero Marika, Prati Giuseppe, Atzori Francesco, Stellato Marco, Massari Francesco, Bersanelli Melissa
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University Hospital of Parma, 14 Gramsci Street, Parma, 43125, Italy Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Ther Adv Urol. 2024 Apr 17;16:17562872241244574. doi: 10.1177/17562872241244574. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
The treatment of heavily pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) represents an unmet medical need and is still challenging.
The primary objective was to assess the effectiveness of the lenvatinib plus everolimus combination and the secondary objective was the toxicity profile of this combination.
We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study examining mRCC patients pre-treated with one or more lines of therapy among different cancer centers in Italy.
The study included patients who received the combination of lenvatinib plus everolimus as either a second-line treatment or beyond. We assessed progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), and toxicity profile. In addition, we explored the potential relationship between treatment effectiveness and clinical and laboratory parameters.
In all, 33 patients were assessed, the median age was 60 years, 57% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1-2 and. 63% received ⩾ 3 prior lines of therapy. 62% were 'intermediate risk' according to the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium and 30% were 'poor risk'. The RR was 42% (no complete response), 18% stable disease. Median OS was 11.2 months (95% CI 6.8-19.9), median PFS was 6.7 months (95% CI 0.6-30.8), and median TTF was 6.7 months (95% CI 4.8-16.6). A shorter OS was significantly associated with lymph node metastases ( = 0.043, 95% CI), neutrophils/ lymphocytes ratio (NLR) ⩾ 3 ( = 0.007), hemoglobin/red cell distribution width ratio cutoff value <0.7 was significant ( = 0.03) while a shorter PFS was associated with lung ( = 0.048) and brain metastases ( = 0.023). The most frequent G1 toxicity was diarrhea (24%), G2 was fatigue (30%), and hypertension and skin toxicity (6%) for G3.
Our findings suggest a clinically relevant effectiveness of lenvatinib plus everolimus combination with an acceptable toxicity profile for heavily pretreated patients with mRCC.
对于接受过大量治疗的转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者,治疗方法仍未满足医学需求,且仍具有挑战性。
主要目的是评估乐伐替尼联合依维莫司的有效性,次要目的是评估该联合用药的毒性特征。
我们进行了一项纵向回顾性研究,调查了意大利不同癌症中心接受过一线或多线治疗的mRCC患者。
该研究纳入了接受乐伐替尼联合依维莫司治疗的患者,作为二线或更后线治疗。我们评估了无进展生存期(PFS)、治疗失败时间(TTF)、总生存期(OS)、缓解率(RR)和毒性特征。此外,我们还探讨了治疗效果与临床及实验室参数之间的潜在关系。
总共评估了33例患者,中位年龄为60岁,57%的东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为1-2,63%的患者接受过≥3线的先前治疗。根据国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟,62%为“中危”,30%为“低危”。RR为42%(无完全缓解),18%为疾病稳定。中位OS为11.2个月(95%CI 6.8-19.9),中位PFS为6.7个月(95%CI 0.6-30.8),中位TTF为6.7个月(95%CI 4.8-16.6)。较短的OS与淋巴结转移(P=0.043,95%CI)、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)≥3(P=0.007)、血红蛋白/红细胞分布宽度比值临界值<0.7显著相关(P=0.03),而较短的PFS与肺转移(P=0.048)和脑转移(P=0.023)相关。最常见的1级毒性是腹泻(24%),2级是疲劳(30%),3级是高血压和皮肤毒性(6%)。
我们的研究结果表明,乐伐替尼联合依维莫司对接受过大量治疗的mRCC患者具有临床相关的有效性和可接受的毒性特征。