Alcohol Research Group at Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA.
Student Health Center, Ohlone College, Fremont, CA, USA.
J Community Health. 2024 Dec;49(6):1017-1025. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01361-6. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
In California, all four-year public colleges have adopted 100% smoke-/tobacco-free policies (TFP) whereas community colleges (CCs), particularly rural CCs, are less likely to have tobacco-free environments. This raises concerns about health equity, particularly because smoking prevalence is higher in rural areas compared to urban. We examined policy adoption barriers and facilitators for rural California CCs with the aim of providing lessons learned to support TFP adoption by rural CCs and improve conditions for student health and well-being.
A multiple case study of four CCs in California with (n = 2) and without (n = 2) TFPs was conducted. Semi-structured interviews with 12 campus and community stakeholders, school administrative data, and policy-relevant documents were analyzed at the case level with comparison across cases to identify key barriers, facilitators and campus-specific experiences.
All four CCs shared similar barriers to policy adoption including concerns about wildfires, individual rights, and fear of marginalizing people who smoke on campus. These CCs have experienced serious wildfires in the last ten years, have high community smoking prevalence, and fewer school resources for student health. For the two tobacco-free CCs, long-term wildfire mitigation efforts along with leadership support, campus/community partnerships and a collective approach involving diverse campus sectors were essential facilitators in successful TFP adoption.
Study results underscore contextual pressures and campus dynamics that impact tobacco control efforts at colleges in rural communities. Strategies to advance college TFP adoption and implementation should recognize rural cultural and community priorities.
在加利福尼亚州,所有四年制公立学院都采取了 100%无烟/禁烟政策(TFP),而社区学院(CCs),特别是农村 CCs,更不可能拥有无烟环境。这引发了人们对健康公平的关注,特别是因为农村地区的吸烟率高于城市地区。我们研究了农村加州 CCs 采取 TFP 的障碍和促进因素,目的是提供经验教训,以支持农村 CCs 采取 TFP,并改善学生健康和福祉的条件。
对加利福尼亚州的四所 CCs 进行了一项多案例研究,其中有(n=2)和没有(n=2)TFPs。对 12 名校园和社区利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈,对学校管理数据和与政策相关的文件进行了分析,并在案例层面进行了比较,以确定关键障碍、促进因素和校园特定经验。
所有四所 CCs 在政策采用方面都面临着类似的障碍,包括对野火、个人权利和担心在校园上吸烟的人被边缘化的担忧。这些 CCs 在过去十年中经历了严重的野火,社区吸烟率高,学生健康的学校资源少。对于两个无烟 CCs,长期的野火缓解工作,加上领导层的支持、校园/社区伙伴关系以及涉及多个校园部门的集体方法,是成功采用 TFP 的重要促进因素。
研究结果强调了影响农村社区学院烟草控制工作的背景压力和校园动态。推进学院 TFP 采用和实施的策略应认识到农村文化和社区的优先事项。