Independent Author.
Department of Sociology, Social Policy and Criminology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Mar-Apr;31(2):e2972. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2972.
We consider the UK Independent Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours' (SPI-B) support for fear messaging during the global COVID-19 pandemic, evaluate the consequences and make recommendations for the future.
Using evidence from published documents, we show that SPI-B supported the use of fear messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic. This is inconsistent with the extant psychological literature and contrary to the disaster planning literature. The recommendations regarding fear messaging may have had harmful ramifications and impacts, especially for young people.
We recommend that a wider multidisciplinary expertise is employed to deal effectively, ethically and holistically with future crises. Plans for future pandemics must include meaningful engagement with the public, particularly children and young people.
我们考虑了英国独立的行为科学大流行洞察小组(SPI-B)在全球 COVID-19 大流行期间对恐惧信息传递的支持,评估了其后果,并为未来提出了建议。
我们使用已发表文献中的证据表明,SPI-B 在 COVID-19 大流行期间支持使用恐惧信息传递。这与现有的心理学文献不一致,也与灾难规划文献相矛盾。关于恐惧信息传递的建议可能产生了有害的影响,尤其是对年轻人而言。
我们建议采用更广泛的多学科专业知识,以有效、合乎道德且全面的方式应对未来的危机。未来大流行计划必须包括与公众,特别是儿童和年轻人的有意义的接触。