• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Design and Pilot Study of a High-Fidelity Medical Simulation of a Hospital-Wide Cybersecurity Attack.医院范围网络安全攻击的高保真医学模拟设计与初步研究
Res Sq. 2024 Apr 5:rs.3.rs-3959502. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3959502/v1.
2
Influence of Human Factors on Cyber Security within Healthcare Organisations: A Systematic Review.人为因素对医疗机构网络安全的影响:系统综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 28;21(15):5119. doi: 10.3390/s21155119.
3
Cybersecurity Challenges and the Academic Health Center: An Interactive Tabletop Simulation for Executives.网络安全挑战与学术健康中心:面向高管的互动桌面模拟。
Acad Med. 2021 Jun 1;96(6):850-853. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003859.
4
Small-Scale High-Fidelity Simulation for Mass Casualty Incident Readiness.针对大规模伤亡事件应急准备的小规模高保真模拟
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 15;6(4):S1-S111. doi: 10.21980/J84S8S. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
A National Survey of Hospital Cyber Attack Emergency Operation Preparedness.一项关于医院网络攻击应急行动准备情况的全国性调查。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2023 Mar 22;17:e363. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2022.283.
6
Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional).医院网络安全风险与差距:综述(面向非网络专业人员)
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 11;4:862221. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862221. eCollection 2022.
7
Improving Emergency Department Airway Preparedness in the Era of COVID-19: An Interprofessional, In Situ Simulation.在新冠疫情时代提升急诊科气道准备水平:一项跨专业现场模拟研究
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 15;5(3):S28-S49. doi: 10.21980/J8V06M. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Implementing the 2009 Institute of Medicine recommendations on resident physician work hours, supervision, and safety.实施 2009 年美国医学研究所关于住院医师工作时间、监督和安全的建议。
Nat Sci Sleep. 2011 Jun 24;3:47-85. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S19649. Print 2011.
9
[Resilience against IT attacks in hospitals : Results from an exercise in a German university hospital].[德国大学医院的医院信息技术攻击抵御能力:一次演练的结果]
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Dec;72(12):852-862. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01331-y. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
10
Healthcare Challenges in the Era of Cybersecurity.网络安全时代的医疗保健挑战。
Health Secur. 2020 May/Jun;18(3):228-231. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0123.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in Ransomware Attacks on US Hospitals, Clinics, and Other Health Care Delivery Organizations, 2016-2021.2016-2021 年美国医院、诊所和其他医疗保健提供组织遭受勒索软件攻击的趋势。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Dec 2;3(12):e224873. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.4873.
2
Hospital cybersecurity risks and gaps: Review (for the non-cyber professional).医院网络安全风险与差距:综述(面向非网络专业人员)
Front Digit Health. 2022 Aug 11;4:862221. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.862221. eCollection 2022.
3
Behavioral responses to a cyber attack in a hospital environment.医院环境中网络攻击的行为反应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 29;11(1):19352. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98576-7.
4
Healthcare cyber-attacks and the COVID-19 pandemic: an urgent threat to global health.医疗保健网络攻击和 COVID-19 大流行:对全球健康的紧迫威胁。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2021 Feb 20;33(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa117.
5
Healthcare Data Breaches: Insights and Implications.医疗保健数据泄露:见解与影响
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 May 13;8(2):133. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8020133.
6
Data breach remediation efforts and their implications for hospital quality.数据泄露补救工作及其对医院质量的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct;54(5):971-980. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13203.
7
The state of research on cyberattacks against hospitals and available best practice recommendations: a scoping review.针对医院的网络攻击研究现状及可用最佳实践建议:范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0724-5.
8
Clinical Cybersecurity Training Through Novel High-Fidelity Simulations.通过新型高保真模拟进行临床网络安全培训
J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;56(2):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.10.029. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
Cybersecurity in healthcare: A narrative review of trends, threats and ways forward.医疗保健中的网络安全:趋势、威胁及未来发展方向的叙述性综述。
Maturitas. 2018 Jul;113:48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 22.
10
Cybersecurity and healthcare: how safe are we?网络安全与医疗保健:我们有多安全?
BMJ. 2017 Jul 6;358:j3179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3179.

医院范围网络安全攻击的高保真医学模拟设计与初步研究

Design and Pilot Study of a High-Fidelity Medical Simulation of a Hospital-Wide Cybersecurity Attack.

作者信息

Marsh-Armstrong Brennan, Pacheco Fernanda, Dameff Christian, Tully Jeffrey

机构信息

University of California San Diego School of Medicine.

University of California San Diego Medical Center.

出版信息

Res Sq. 2024 Apr 5:rs.3.rs-3959502. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3959502/v1.

DOI:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3959502/v1
PMID:38645079
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11030511/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cybersecurity incidents affecting hospitals have grown in prevalence and consequence over the last two decades, increasing the importance of cybersecurity preparedness and response training to minimize clinical disruptions. This work describes the development, execution, and post-exercise assessment of a novel simulation scenario consisting of four interlocking intensive care unit (ICU) patient scenarios. This simulation was designed to demonstrate the management of acute pathologies without access to conventional treatment methods during a cybersecurity incident in order to raise clinician awareness of the increasing incidence and patient safety implications of such events.

METHODS

The simulation was developed by a multidisciplinary team of physicians, simulation experts, and medical education experts at UCSD School of Medicine. The simulation involves the treatment of four patients, respectively experiencing postoperative hemorrhage, end stage renal disease, diabetic ketoacidosis, and hypoxic respiratory failure, all without access to networked medical resources. The simulation was first executed as part of the proceedings of CyberMed Summit, a healthcare cybersecurity conference in La Jolla, California, on November 19th, 2022. Following the simulation, a debrief session was held with the learner in front of conference attendees, with additional questioning and discussion prompted by attendee input.

RESULTS

Though limited to a single subject by the pilot-study nature of this research, the physician learner successfully identified the acute etiologies and managed the patients' acute decompensations while lacking access to the hospital's electronic medical records (EMRs), laboratory results, imaging, and communication systems. Review of footage of the event and post-experience interviews yielded numerous insights on the specific physician-focused challenges and possible solutions to a hospital-infrastructure-crippling cyber attack.

CONCLUSION

Healthcare cybersecurity incidents are known to result in significant disruption of clinical activities and can be viewed through a patient-safety oriented perspective. Simulation training may be a particularly effective method for raising clinician awareness of and preparedness for these events, though further research is required.

摘要

背景

在过去二十年中,影响医院的网络安全事件在发生率和后果方面都有所增加,这凸显了网络安全防范和应急培训对于减少临床干扰的重要性。这项工作描述了一种新颖模拟场景的开发、执行和演练后评估,该场景由四个相互关联的重症监护病房(ICU)患者场景组成。此模拟旨在展示在网络安全事件期间,在无法使用传统治疗方法的情况下对急性病症的管理,以提高临床医生对这类事件发生率上升及其对患者安全影响的认识。

方法

该模拟由加州大学圣地亚哥分校医学院的医生、模拟专家和医学教育专家组成的多学科团队开发。模拟涉及对四名患者的治疗,他们分别经历术后出血、终末期肾病、糖尿病酮症酸中毒和低氧性呼吸衰竭,且均无法使用联网医疗资源。该模拟于2022年11月19日在加利福尼亚州拉霍亚举行的医疗网络安全会议“CyberMed峰会”的议程中首次执行。模拟结束后,在会议参与者面前与学习者进行了一次总结会议,并根据参与者的意见进行了额外的提问和讨论。

结果

尽管由于本研究的试点性质,样本仅为一名受试者,但这位医生学习者在无法访问医院电子病历(EMR)、实验室结果、影像和通信系统的情况下,成功识别了急性病因并处理了患者的急性失代偿情况。对事件录像和经验后访谈的回顾,产生了许多关于以医生为重点的特定挑战以及应对使医院基础设施瘫痪的网络攻击的可能解决方案的见解。

结论

已知医疗网络安全事件会导致临床活动的重大干扰,并且可以从以患者安全为导向的角度来看待。模拟培训可能是提高临床医生对这些事件的认识和准备程度的一种特别有效的方法,不过还需要进一步研究。