Calderón-Canseco Iván Josué, Pérez-Turrent Manuel A, Ramírez-García Miguel Ángel, Fernández-Ananín Sonia, Targarona Soler Eduardo María, Balagué-Ponz María
Department of General Surgery, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social General Regional Hospital No. 1 "Dr. Carlos Mac Gregor Sanchez Navarro", Mexico City, MEX.
Department of General Surgery, Hospital General Dr. Manuel Gea González, Mexico City, MEX.
Cureus. 2024 Mar 22;16(3):e56730. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56730. eCollection 2024 Mar.
Gastric cancer remains a significant global health challenge with varied survival rates, emphasizing the need for research into effective surgical treatments. In this retrospective study, we compared the 72-month overall and disease-free survival between laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy (AG) in a cohort of 139 patients treated for gastric cancer. The analysis revealed that patients undergoing LG exhibited a significantly higher overall survival rate at 72 months compared to those undergoing AG. Although disease-free survival rates were comparable between the two groups, LG showed a marginal advantage. Subgroup analyses based on the type of gastrectomy and anastomosis demonstrated varied survival probabilities, with laparoscopic-assisted partial gastrectomy yielding the most favorable outcomes. These results highlight the importance of the choice of surgical technique in influencing survival outcomes in gastric cancer.
胃癌仍然是一项重大的全球健康挑战,其生存率各不相同,这凸显了开展有效手术治疗研究的必要性。在这项回顾性研究中,我们比较了139例接受胃癌治疗患者中腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)和腹腔镜辅助胃切除术(AG)的72个月总生存率和无病生存率。分析显示,与接受AG的患者相比,接受LG的患者在72个月时的总生存率显著更高。尽管两组的无病生存率相当,但LG显示出微弱优势。基于胃切除术类型和吻合术的亚组分析显示了不同的生存概率,其中腹腔镜辅助部分胃切除术产生了最有利的结果。这些结果突出了手术技术选择对胃癌生存结果的影响的重要性。