Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University.
Department of Psychology, University of Denver.
J Fam Psychol. 2024 Aug;38(5):743-750. doi: 10.1037/fam0001229. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
Positive and negative aspects of intimate relationships influence mental health and well-being in couples. According to the environmental sensitivity framework, individuals differ in how strongly they are affected by their environment, with some individuals being more or less sensitive to both negative and positive experiences. The present study examined the longitudinal associations between positive and negative relationship dynamics, including marital satisfaction, positive bonding, and negative communication, and psychological distress as well as the extent to which individual differences in genetic and subjective measures of environmental sensitivity moderated the association between relationship dynamics and psychological distress in a sample of couples in the U.S. Army ( = 238 individuals representing 152 unique couples). Sensitivity was measured by self-report and a polygenic score derived from previous genome-wide association study results. Separate three-level multilevel models were conducted for each relationship dynamic and sensitivity variable. Only for subjective (i.e., self-reported) sensitivity did significant cross-level interactions emerge in predicting psychological distress, whereas no such interactions were found for genetic (i.e., polygenic score) sensitivity. Specifically, lower marital satisfaction and positive bonding were associated with higher psychological distress among subjectively highly sensitive individuals, and higher negative communication was associated with higher psychological distress among subjectively highly sensitive individuals. Findings suggest that both low positive and high negative relationship dynamics may have a greater effect on psychological distress among highly sensitive individuals, which may help to inform tailored intervention to meet the unique needs of couples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
亲密关系的积极和消极方面会影响夫妻双方的心理健康和幸福感。根据环境敏感性框架,个体对环境的影响程度存在差异,有些人对负面和正面体验的敏感性更高或更低。本研究在美国陆军的一个样本中,检验了积极和消极关系动态(包括婚姻满意度、积极联系和消极沟通)与心理困扰之间的纵向关联,以及个体遗传和主观环境敏感性测量的差异在多大程度上调节了这种关联。敏感性通过自我报告和先前全基因组关联研究结果得出的多基因评分来衡量。对于每个关系动态和敏感性变量,都分别进行了三级多层模型分析。只有主观(即自我报告)敏感性在预测心理困扰方面出现了显著的跨水平交互作用,而遗传(即多基因评分)敏感性则没有出现这种交互作用。具体来说,在主观上高度敏感的个体中,较低的婚姻满意度和积极联系与较高的心理困扰有关,而较高的消极沟通与主观上高度敏感的个体的较高心理困扰有关。研究结果表明,低水平的积极关系动态和高水平的消极关系动态可能对高度敏感的个体的心理困扰产生更大的影响,这可能有助于提供定制化的干预措施,以满足夫妻的独特需求。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。