Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America.
Phys Med Biol. 2024 May 21;69(11). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad41b3.
. Photon-counting detector (PCD) CT enables routine virtual-monoenergetic image (VMI) reconstruction. We evaluated the performance of an automatic VMI energy level (keV) selection tool on a clinical PCD-CT system in comparison to an automatic tube potential (kV) selection tool from an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT system from the same manufacturer.Four torso-shaped phantoms (20-50 cm width) containing iodine (2, 5, and 10 mg cc) and calcium (100 mg cc) were scanned on PCD-CT and EID-CT. Dose optimization techniques, task-based VMI energy level and tube-potential selection on PCD-CT (CARE keV) and task-based tube potential selection on EID-CT (CARE kV), were enabled. CT numbers, image noise, and dose-normalized contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared.. PCD-CT produced task-specific VMIs at 70, 65, 60, and 55 keV for non-contrast, bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular settings, respectively. A 120 kV tube potential was automatically selected on PCD-CT for all scans. In comparison, EID-CT used x-ray tube potentials from 80 to 150 kV based on imaging task and phantom size. PCD-CT achieved consistent dose reduction at 9%, 21% and 39% for bone, soft tissue with contrast, and vascular tasks relative to the non-contrast task, independent of phantom size. On EID-CT, dose reduction factor for contrast tasks relative to the non-contrast task ranged from a 65% decrease (vascular task, 70 kV, 20 cm phantom) to a 21% increase (soft tissue with contrast task, 150 kV, 50 cm phantom) due to size-specific tube potential adaptation. PCD-CT CNRwas equivalent to or higher than those of EID-CT for all tasks and phantom sizes, except for the vascular task with 20 cm phantom, where 70 kV EID-CT CNRoutperformed 55 keV PCD-CT images.. PCD-CT produced more consistent CT numbers compared to EID-CT due to standardized VMI output, which greatly benefits standardization efforts and facilitates radiation dose reduction.
光子计数探测器(PCD)CT 能够常规进行虚拟单能量图像(VMI)重建。我们评估了一款临床 PCD-CT 系统中自动 VMI 能量水平(keV)选择工具的性能,该工具与同一家制造商的能量积分探测器(EID)CT 系统中的自动管电压(kV)选择工具进行了比较。四个躯干形状的体模(20-50cm 宽),包含碘(2、5 和 10mg cc)和钙(100mg cc),在 PCD-CT 和 EID-CT 上进行了扫描。启用了 PCD-CT 上的剂量优化技术、基于任务的 VMI 能量水平和管电压选择(CARE keV)以及 EID-CT 上的基于任务的管电压选择(CARE kV)。比较了 CT 数、图像噪声和剂量归一化对比噪声比(CNR)。PCD-CT 为非对比、骨、软组织有对比和血管设置分别生成了特定于任务的 70、65、60 和 55keV 的 VMIs。PCD-CT 为所有扫描自动选择了 120kV 的管电压。相比之下,EID-CT 根据成像任务和体模大小,使用了 80-150kV 的 X 射线管电压。PCD-CT 在骨、软组织有对比和血管任务相对于非对比任务的剂量减少了 9%、21%和 39%,这是一致的,与体模大小无关。在 EID-CT 上,相对于非对比任务,对比任务的剂量减少因子范围从 65%(血管任务,70kV,20cm 体模)到 21%(软组织有对比任务,150kV,50cm 体模),这是由于特定于体模大小的管电压适应性所致。PCD-CT 的 CNR 在所有任务和体模尺寸上与 EID-CT 相当或更高,除了血管任务(20cm 体模,70kV EID-CT 的 CNR 优于 55keV PCD-CT 图像)。PCD-CT 由于标准化的 VMI 输出,与 EID-CT 相比,产生了更一致的 CT 数,这极大地有利于标准化工作并促进了辐射剂量的减少。