Department of Prosthodontics, Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2024 Apr 1;24(2):144-151. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_421_23. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
The main aim of the present study was to compare and evaluate the effect of repetitive firings on different shades of a pressable all ceramic system layered with veneering porcelain.
In-vitro comparative study.
An in vitro comparative study was conducted, and a total of 60 disc shaped specimens (15 mm in diameter and 0.8 mm in thickness) were made of heat pressed ceramic of shades A2, A3, and B2 (20 discs of each shade) grouped as Group I, II, and III, respectively, using the lost wax technique. The discs were subsequently layered with veneering porcelain followed by glazing and overglazing and underwent a firing cycle at each step until six times combined. CIE Lab* measurements were noted on each sample after the third, fourth, fifth, and sixth firing using VITA Easyshade Advance 4.0 spectrophotometer.
Statistical Analysis was done by SPSS 17.0 software. One way analysis of variance, multiple comparisons using the Tukey test, and descriptive statistical analysis were done for all the groups in the study. P <0.05 was statistically significant.
The mean color differences for the repeated firings were imperceptible (ΔE <1.67) to the human eye for all ceramic samples tested except between the fourth and fifth firing of Group II (shade A3).
The analysis revealed that although repeated firings lead to changes in L*, a*, and b* values, the mean color difference was below the clinically acceptable color change (ΔE <3.7).
本研究的主要目的是比较和评估对不同色调的可压陶瓷系统进行重复烧制对分层饰面瓷的影响。
体外对比研究。
进行了一项体外对比研究,共制作了 60 个圆盘状试件(直径 15mm,厚度 0.8mm),采用失蜡技术,由热压陶瓷制成,色调分别为 A2、A3 和 B2(每种色调 20 个圆盘),分别分组为 I 组、II 组和 III 组。然后,将这些圆盘分层覆盖饰面瓷,再进行上釉和上光处理,并在每个步骤进行一次烧制循环,直到总共进行六次。使用 VITA Easyshade Advance 4.0 分光光度计在第三次、第四次、第五次和第六次烧制后,对每个样本进行 CIE Lab*测量。
使用 SPSS 17.0 软件进行统计分析。对研究中所有组进行单向方差分析、使用 Tukey 检验进行多重比较以及描述性统计分析。P<0.05 为统计学显著差异。
除了 II 组(色调 A3)第四次和第五次烧制之间外,对于所有测试的全陶瓷样本,重复烧制的平均颜色差异对于人眼是不可察觉的(ΔE<1.67)。
分析表明,尽管重复烧制会导致 L*、a和 b值发生变化,但平均颜色差异低于临床可接受的颜色变化(ΔE<3.7)。