Suppr超能文献

比较两种含氟溶液和两种树脂基修复材料的细胞相容性——一项初步研究。

Comparing cytocompatibility of two fluoride-containing solutions and two resin-based restorative materials-a pilot study.

作者信息

Mulder Riaan, Noordien Naeemah, Potgieter Nicoline

机构信息

Department of Prothodontic Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

Department of Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

Front Oral Health. 2024 Apr 8;5:1330944. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1330944. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytocompatibility should always be considered, especially if the surface of treated carious lesions is close to soft tissue or is accidentally exposed to the oral soft tissue by the clinician.

METHODS

The aim of the present study was to compare the cytocompatibility of two fluoride-containing liquids and two resin-containing restorative materials with buccal mucosa fibroblasts. The fluoride-containing materials were silver diamine fluoride and water-based silver fluoride.

RESULTS

The statistical analysis was completed by comparing the positive control growth of the buccal mucosa fibroblasts to the growth of cells exposed to various materials. The one-way ANOVA with Tukey's HSD result was completed. All the assessed materials compared to the control wells for both the 24 and 48 h time intervals indicated a significant cytocompatibility result, except for the test wells with Stela (SDI) at the 24 h time interval. There was no significant difference between the step 2 liquids and the two dental materials in cytocompatibility at the 24 h interval. All four materials indicated no significant differences between the cytocompatibility of any dental materials for 48 h.

CONCLUSION

The cytocompatibility assessment for Riva Star and Riva Star Aqua with the direct method in a full dispensing drop is not viable for step 1 of the fluoride-containing liquids. The use of Stela Light Cure is a suitable material that will be in contact with buccal mucosa as it showed potential for increased cytocompatibility compared to Riva Light Cure. Riva Star Aqua is more cytocompatible than Riva Star.

摘要

背景

应始终考虑细胞相容性,特别是当治疗的龋损表面靠近软组织或临床医生意外将其暴露于口腔软组织时。

方法

本研究的目的是比较两种含氟液体和两种含树脂修复材料与颊黏膜成纤维细胞的细胞相容性。含氟材料为氟化银氨溶液和水基氟化银。

结果

通过比较颊黏膜成纤维细胞的阳性对照生长与暴露于各种材料的细胞生长来完成统计分析。完成了带有Tukey's HSD结果的单因素方差分析。与对照孔相比,在24小时和48小时时间间隔内评估的所有材料均显示出显著的细胞相容性结果,但在24小时时间间隔内使用Stela(SDI)的测试孔除外。在24小时间隔时,步骤2液体与两种牙科材料在细胞相容性方面无显著差异。所有四种材料在48小时时,任何牙科材料的细胞相容性之间均无显著差异。

结论

对于含氟液体的步骤1,采用全滴法直接评估Riva Star和Riva Star Aqua的细胞相容性不可行。使用Stela光固化材料是一种适合与颊黏膜接触的材料,因为与Riva光固化材料相比,它显示出细胞相容性增加的潜力。Riva Star Aqua比Riva Star具有更高的细胞相容性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验