Suppr超能文献

采用嵌体式关节盂组件的解剖型全肩关节置换术:一项系统评价

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with inlay glenoid component: A systematic review.

作者信息

Berk Alexander N, Cregar William M, Rao Allison J, Trofa David P, Schiffern Shadley C, Hamid Nady, Saltzman Bryan M

机构信息

OrthoCarolina-Sports Medicine Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Apr;16(2):119-128. doi: 10.1177/17585732231154850. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) system utilizing an inlay glenoid component has been proposed as a means of reducing glenoid component loosening while still providing patients with desirable functional and clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to systematically review current outcomes literature on TSA using an inlay glenoid component.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Web of Science databases. Studies comparing pre- and postoperative functional and clinical outcomes were included.

RESULTS

Five studies with 148 shoulders (133 patients) were included. Patient-reported outcomes improved, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean change 34.1 to 80.6), Penn Shoulder Score (mean change 43.3 to 85.5), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score (mean change 34.1 to 80.6), and visual analog scale-pain (mean change 6.9 to 1.6). Range of motion improved for forward elevation (mean change 109.6 to 156.2) and external rotation (mean change 21.5 to 50.8). Glenoid component loosening occurred in one shoulder (0.68%). Two revision surgeries (1.35%) were performed.

DISCUSSION

The use of an inlay glenoid component is associated with improvements in postoperative pain, function, and satisfaction while minimizing rates of glenoid component loosening and the need for revision surgery over short-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

systematic review, level IV.

摘要

背景

一种采用嵌体式关节盂组件的全肩关节置换术(TSA)系统已被提出,作为减少关节盂组件松动的一种方法,同时仍能为患者提供理想的功能和临床结果。本研究的目的是系统回顾目前关于使用嵌体式关节盂组件的TSA的结果文献。

方法

使用PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane系统评价数据库和科学网数据库进行文献检索。纳入比较术前和术后功能及临床结果的研究。

结果

纳入了5项研究,共148个肩关节(133例患者)。患者报告的结果有所改善,包括美国肩肘外科医师评分(平均变化从34.1至80.6)、宾夕法尼亚肩部评分(平均变化从43.3至85.5)、单项评估数字评价评分(平均变化从34.1至80.6)和视觉模拟评分-疼痛(平均变化从6.9至1.6)。前屈(平均变化从109.6至156.2)和外旋(平均变化从21.5至50.8)的活动范围有所改善。1个肩关节(0.68%)发生关节盂组件松动。进行了2次翻修手术(1.35%)。

讨论

使用嵌体式关节盂组件与术后疼痛、功能和满意度的改善相关,同时在短期随访中使关节盂组件松动率和翻修手术需求降至最低。

证据水平

系统评价,IV级。

相似文献

4
10
Inlay total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis.原发性盂肱关节炎的嵌体全肩关节置换术。
JSES Int. 2021 Sep 15;5(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.014. eCollection 2021 Nov.

本文引用的文献

2
Inlay total shoulder arthroplasty for primary glenohumeral arthritis.原发性盂肱关节炎的嵌体全肩关节置换术。
JSES Int. 2021 Sep 15;5(6):1014-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.014. eCollection 2021 Nov.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验