Suppr超能文献

在德国初级保健中使用沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭患者:AURORA-HF 非干预性研究。

Use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure in primary care in Germany: the AURORA-HF noninterventional study.

机构信息

Institut für Herzinfarktforschung, Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Bremserstraße 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

出版信息

Herz. 2024 Oct;49(5):385-392. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05248-z. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is the first angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor indicated for symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Given most patients with HF in Germany are managed by general practitioners, AURORA-HF investigated the baseline characteristics and 1‑year follow-up of patients starting Sac/Val in primary care in Germany.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study, with all treatment decisions independent of participation. The only inclusion criteria were adults (age ≥ 18 years) with symptomatic HFrEF. The study comprised four groups, depending on therapy on entry: initiation of (1) Sac/Val or (2) other HF therapy; and no change in HF regimen that (3) included or (4) did not include Sac/Val. Baseline data were captured for all groups; 1‑year follow-up was recorded in groups 1 and 2.

RESULTS

Of 1278 patients in the baseline analyses, 513 (40.1%) had newly started Sac/Val (449 [87.5%] completing the 1‑year follow-up), 265 (20.7%) had newly started other HF regimens (245, 92.5%) with 1‑year follow-up, while 249 with Sac/Val (19.5%) and 251 without Sac/Val (19.6%) patients had unchanged therapies. Patients treated with Sac/Val had a higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) class at baseline and more often a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%. The only baseline parameter significantly correlating with Sac/Val discontinuation during the 1‑year follow-up was diabetes mellitus (odds ratio: 2.44; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-5.24). In the Sac/Val group, 30.7% of patients were in NYHA class I/II on study entry, improving to 51.0% at 1‑year follow-up. In the no Sac/Val group, the corresponding rates of NYHA I and II classes were 49.8% and 58.2%, respectively. The overall adverse event profile of Sac/Val was good, with only 6.0% patients experiencing serious adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

In patients with symptomatic HFrEF treated in primary care, the group in whom Sac/Val was initiated was characterized by a higher NYHA class and lower LVEF compared to patients in whom Sac/Val was not initiated. Sac/Val was well tolerated, with a high proportion completing 1 year of therapy.

摘要

背景

沙库巴曲缬沙坦(Sac/Val)是首个用于治疗射血分数降低的慢性心力衰竭(HFrEF)的血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂。鉴于德国大多数心力衰竭患者由全科医生管理,AURORA-HF 研究了德国初级保健中开始使用 Sac/Val 的患者的基线特征和 1 年随访结果。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究,所有治疗决策均独立于参与研究。唯一的纳入标准是患有症状性 HFrEF 的成年人(年龄≥18 岁)。该研究包括四个组,根据进入时的治疗情况进行分组:开始(1)Sac/Val 或(2)其他心力衰竭治疗;以及心力衰竭治疗方案(3)不变,包括或(4)不包括 Sac/Val。所有组均记录基线数据;第 1 组和第 2 组记录 1 年随访结果。

结果

在基线分析的 1278 例患者中,513 例(40.1%)开始新使用 Sac/Val(449 例[87.5%]完成 1 年随访),265 例(20.7%)开始新使用其他心力衰竭治疗方案(245 例,92.5%)并完成 1 年随访,而 249 例使用 Sac/Val(19.5%)和 251 例不使用 Sac/Val(19.6%)的患者未改变治疗方案。开始使用 Sac/Val 的患者基线时纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级更高,射血分数(LVEF)<35%的患者更多。唯一与 1 年随访期间 Sac/Val 停药显著相关的基线参数是糖尿病(比值比:2.44;95%置信区间:1.14-5.24)。在 Sac/Val 组中,30.7%的患者在研究入组时处于 NYHA I/II 级,1 年随访时改善至 51.0%。在无 Sac/Val 组中,NYHA I 和 II 级的相应比例分别为 49.8%和 58.2%。Sac/Val 的总体不良事件谱良好,仅有 6.0%的患者发生导致永久停药的严重不良事件。

结论

在初级保健中治疗的有症状 HFrEF 患者中,与未开始使用 Sac/Val 的患者相比,开始使用 Sac/Val 的患者 NYHA 心功能分级更高,LVEF 更低。Sac/Val 耐受良好,有很高比例的患者完成 1 年治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验