Suppr超能文献

种植体支持的固定局部修复体周围组织健康和骨吸收。

Peri-implant Tissue Health and Bone Resorption in Implant- Supported Fixed Partial Rehabilitations.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Apr 24;39(2):294-301. doi: 10.11607/jomi.10361.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate peri-implant tissue health and bone resorption in patients with implant-supported fixed partial rehabilitations. In particular, possible correlations between plaque accumulation and bone loss, as well as other periimplant health parameters, were investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 44 patients rehabilitated with fixed implant-supported partial rehabilitations were included. The following parameters were recorded: spontaneous bleeding (SB), suppuration, bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), and probing depth (PD). Periapical radiographs were taken to measure crestal bone loss (BL). A nonparametric test (Spearman rank coefficient; rs) was used to identify possible correlations between the clinical parameters recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 121 implants were analyzed. Global PI and BOP were 49.58% and 20.25%, respectively. There were no cases of suppuration, and only 2 implants showed spontaneous bleeding. Mean BL was 1.53 mm (SD: 0.98). No implants showed peri-implantitis. There was a weak, statistically significant correlation between PI and BL (rs = 0.27, P [2-tailed] = .99) and between PI and the other peri-implant parameters (BOP: rs = 0.14, P = .14; PD: rs = 0.04, P = .65; SB: rs = -0.08, P = .34). A very weak correlation was also found between BL and BOP (rs = 0.1, P = .2) and between BL and PD (rs = 0.02, P = .7). Correlation was found between BL and age (rs = 0.13, P = .81) and between the other peri-implant parameters and age using dichotomization (> or < 65 years; PI: rs = -0.14, P = .11; PD: rs = -0.21, P = .01; BOP: rs = -0.21, P = .01; SB: rs = 0.05, P = .53). No statistically significant correlations were found between the clinical parameters evaluated and the sex or the dental arch treated (maxilla vs mandible). In contrast, the correlation between periodontal parameters and years elapsed since surgery (follow-up) was significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The present research suggests that in implant-supported fixed partial rehabilitations, dental implants with greater plaque accumulation are more likely to present augmented probing depth, peri-implant inflammation, and bone loss, although the correlation is statistically very weak. Patient age and time of follow-up also significantly affected peri-implant health parameters.

摘要

目的

评估种植体支持的固定局部修复患者的种植体周围组织健康和骨吸收情况。特别研究了菌斑积累与骨丢失之间以及其他种植体周围健康参数之间的可能相关性。

材料和方法

共纳入 44 名接受固定种植体支持的局部修复的患者。记录以下参数:自发性出血(SB)、溢脓、探诊出血(BOP)、菌斑指数(PI)和探诊深度(PD)。拍摄根尖片测量边缘骨丧失(BL)。使用非参数检验(Spearman 秩相关系数;rs)来确定记录的临床参数之间可能存在的相关性。

结果

共分析了 121 个种植体。总体 PI 和 BOP 分别为 49.58%和 20.25%。无溢脓病例,仅 2 个种植体出现自发性出血。平均 BL 为 1.53mm(SD:0.98)。无种植体周围炎。PI 与 BL(rs=0.27,P[双侧] =.99)和 PI 与其他种植体周围参数(BOP:rs=0.14,P=.14;PD:rs=0.04,P=.65;SB:rs= -0.08,P=.34)之间存在弱的、具有统计学意义的相关性。BL 与 BOP(rs=0.1,P=.2)和 BL 与 PD(rs=0.02,P=.7)之间也存在非常弱的相关性。BL 与年龄(rs=0.13,P=.81)之间以及其他种植体周围参数与年龄(>65 岁与 <65 岁;PI:rs= -0.14,P=.11;PD:rs= -0.21,P=.01;BOP:rs= -0.21,P=.01;SB:rs=0.05,P=.53)之间存在相关性。评估的临床参数与性别或治疗的牙弓(上颌与下颌)之间未发现具有统计学意义的相关性。相反,牙周参数与手术(随访)后时间之间的相关性具有统计学意义。

结论

本研究表明,在种植体支持的固定局部修复中,具有更多菌斑积累的种植体更有可能出现探诊深度增加、种植体周围炎症和骨丢失,尽管相关性在统计学上非常微弱。患者年龄和随访时间也显著影响种植体周围健康参数。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验