Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Research Institute for Medical Innovation, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
J Psychosom Res. 2024 Jun;181:111667. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111667. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
The aim of this study was to explore experiences of stigma in Functional Neurological Disorder (FND) from the perspective of the patient as it manifests from the onset of symptoms, up to diagnosis and subsequently.
The existing literature clearly shows that stigma exists for many patients with FND, and is associated with poorer quality of life. However, it is less clear how stigma unfolds, and how it can be alleviated.
We performed a qualitative interview study with patients who were diagnosed with FND, using data based on semi-structured interviews. Participants were recruited purposively via outpatient clinics. We analysed the data using a reflexive thematic analytic approach, through the lens of recognised stigma frameworks.
15 participants were included in the study, aged between 19 and 68 years, with varying presentations of FND. We identified six themes and 16 subthemes relevant to their stigma trajectory. We found that stigma unfolds through four main domains: 1) through their symptom experience; 2) through "othering" by the healthcare system; 3) through everyday interactions; and 4) from within the self. Across these four domains was a central theme of 5) stages of knowledge, which both fuelled and countered stigma. Lastly, 6) validation of the patient experience emerged as a theme that alleviated stigma.
Stigma did not unfold as a linear process, rather it came from multiple interacting sources. Interventions to target stigma could take the form of improved clinician training, communication, especially around point of diagnosis, and public interventions, co-produced with patients with FND.
本研究旨在从患者的角度探讨功能性神经障碍(FND)的污名体验,其表现从症状出现开始,直至诊断和随后的阶段。
现有文献清楚地表明,许多 FND 患者存在污名,且与较差的生活质量相关。然而,污名是如何展开的,以及如何减轻污名,尚不清楚。
我们对被诊断为 FND 的患者进行了定性访谈研究,使用基于半结构化访谈的数据。通过门诊诊所有目的地招募参与者。我们通过反映公认的污名框架的反思性主题分析方法来分析数据。
研究纳入了 15 名年龄在 19 至 68 岁之间、表现各异的 FND 患者。我们确定了与他们的污名轨迹相关的六个主题和 16 个子主题。我们发现,污名通过四个主要领域展开:1)通过他们的症状体验;2)通过医疗保健系统的“他者化”;3)通过日常互动;4)来自自身。在这四个领域中,有一个核心主题是 5)知识的阶段,它既助长了污名,又对其产生了反作用。最后,6)患者体验的验证作为减轻污名的一个主题出现。
污名不是一个线性过程,而是来自多个相互作用的来源。针对污名的干预措施可以采取改善临床医生培训、沟通的形式,尤其是在诊断时,以及与 FND 患者共同制定的公共干预措施。