Low Sean, Fritz Livia, Baum Chad M, Sovacool Benjamin K
Department of Business Development and Technology, Aarhus University, Birk Centerpark 15, 7400, Herning, Denmark.
Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex Business School, Jubilee Building, Arts Rd, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9SL, UK.
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 24;15(1):3453. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47853-w.
Carbon removal is emerging as a pillar of governmental and industry commitments toward achieving Net Zero targets. Drawing from 44 focus groups in 22 countries, we map technical and societal issues that a representative sample of publics raise on five major types of carbon removal (forests, soils, direct air capture, enhanced weathering, and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage), and how these translate to preferences for governance actors, mechanisms, and rationales. We assess gaps and overlaps between a global range of public perceptions and how carbon removal is currently emerging in assessment, innovation, and decision-making. In conclusion, we outline key societal expectations for informing assessment and policy: prioritize public engagement as more than acceptance research; scrutiny and regulation of industry beyond incentivizing innovation; systemic coordination across sectors, levels, and borders; and prioritize underlying causes of climate change and interrelated governance issues.
碳去除正成为政府和行业实现净零目标承诺的一大支柱。我们从22个国家的44个焦点小组中获取信息,梳理出公众代表样本就五种主要碳去除类型(森林、土壤、直接空气捕获、强化风化以及碳捕获与封存生物能源)提出的技术和社会问题,以及这些问题如何转化为对治理行为体、机制和基本原理的偏好。我们评估了全球范围内公众认知与碳去除在当前评估、创新和决策中的实际呈现之间的差距与重叠。总之,我们概述了指导评估和政策制定的关键社会期望:将公众参与置于比接受度研究更重要的位置;除了激励创新外,对行业进行审查和监管;跨部门、层级和边界进行系统性协调;优先考虑气候变化的根本原因和相关治理问题。