Mertens Jan, Breyer Christian, Belmans Ronnie, Gendron Corinne, Geoffron Patrice, Fischer Carolyn, Du Fornel Elodie, Lester Richard, Nicholas Kimberly A, de Miranda Paulo Emilio V, Palhol Sarah, Verwee Peter, Sala Olivier, Webber Michael, Debackere Koenraad
ENGIE Research, 1 PL. Samuel de Champlain, Paris-la Défense, 92930 Paris, France.
Department of Electromechanical, System and Metal Engineering, Ghent University, Technologiepark Zwijnaarde 131, Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
iScience. 2024 Nov 19;27(12):111418. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111418. eCollection 2024 Dec 20.
Climate modeling suggests that achieving international climate goals requires a reduction in current CO emissions by over 90%, with any remaining emissions to be addressed through carbon dioxide removal (CDR) solutions. Sixteen CDR strategies are evaluated by integrating technical potential, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria, along with sequestration permanence. This evaluation, conducted by ENGIE's scientific council using an interdisciplinary Delphi panel methodology, proposes a "quality" measure for each technology. This measure combines ESG scores and sequestration timescales to rank and select the most promising solutions. The findings highlight the necessity for further research to understand and mitigate ESG impacts, aiming to inform both future research and current decision-making to support the effective and legitimate use of CDR strategies.
气候模型表明,要实现国际气候目标,需要将当前的二氧化碳排放量减少90%以上,任何剩余排放都要通过二氧化碳去除(CDR)解决方案来解决。通过整合技术潜力、环境、社会和治理(ESG)标准以及封存持久性,对16种CDR策略进行了评估。ENGIE的科学委员会采用跨学科德尔菲专家小组方法进行了这项评估,为每种技术提出了一种“质量”衡量标准。该衡量标准结合了ESG分数和封存时间尺度,以对最有前景的解决方案进行排名和选择。研究结果凸显了进一步开展研究以了解和减轻ESG影响的必要性,旨在为未来研究和当前决策提供信息,以支持CDR策略的有效和合法使用。